Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APACSony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC
VS
SAG-AFTRASAG-AFTRA
Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC

Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC

N/A

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Great Stories Travel. Sony Pictures Television Distribution brings premium series and films to audiences by partnering with leading production companies, networks, and platforms around the world. Rooted in independence and powered by creativity, Sony Pictures delivers ...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SAG-AFTRA

SAG-AFTRA

5757 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, 90036, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sagaftra.org
782/1000Fair

With national offices in Los Angeles and New York, and local offices nationwide, SAG-AFTRA is the iconic American labor union that represents approximately 160,000 media professionals. Our members are the talented faces and voices that entertain and inform America and...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:11,883
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC

Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SAG-AFTRA

SAG-AFTRA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SAG-AFTRA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SAG-AFTRA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAG-AFTRA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC

Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SAG-AFTRA

SAG-AFTRA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC company and SAG-AFTRA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC and SAG-AFTRA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC and SAG-AFTRA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC or SAG-AFTRA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC or SAG-AFTRA ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC and SAG-AFTRA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sony Pictures Television – Distribution APAC and SAG-AFTRA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2