Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sonepar USASonepar USA
VS
Porsche HoldingPorsche Holding
Sonepar USA

Sonepar USA

4400 Leeds Ave , Charleston, SC, 29405, US

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.soneparusa.com
762/1000Fair

Sonepar is an independent family-owned company standing as the world leader in B-to-B distribution of electrical equipment, solutions, and services. In 2023, Sonepar achieved sales of $36 billion.* Present in 40 countries with a dense network of brands, the Group is lea...

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:7,603
Subsidiaries:97
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Porsche Holding

Porsche Holding

Louise-Piëch-Straße 2, Salzburg, AT

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Porsche Holding Salzburg is the largest and most successful automotive distributor in Europe. Our roots are in Salzburg, but we now also operate in 29 countries on three continents. Our core expertise: global automotive distribution. Our business divisions: automotive w...

NAICS:42
NAICS Definition:Wholesale Trade
Employees:10,474
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sonepar USA

Sonepar USA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Porsche Holding

Porsche Holding

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sonepar USA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porsche Holding in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sonepar USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sonepar USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Porsche Holding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porsche Holding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sonepar USA

Sonepar USA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Porsche Holding

Porsche Holding

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sonepar USA company and Porsche Holding company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sonepar USA and Porsche Holding, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sonepar USA and Porsche Holding, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sonepar USA or Porsche Holding ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sonepar USA or Porsche Holding ?
Between Sonepar USA and Porsche Holding, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sonepar USA and Porsche Holding, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2