Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SolarWinds MSP is now N-ableSolarWinds MSP is now N-able
VS
DoorDashDoorDash
SolarWinds MSP is now N-able

SolarWinds MSP is now N-able

3030 Slater Rd, Morrisville, 27560, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.n-able.com
750/1000Fair

N-able fuels IT services providers with powerful software solutions to monitor, manage, and secure their customers’ systems, data, and networks. Built on a scalable platform, we offer secure infrastructure and tools to simplify complex ecosystems, as well as resources t...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:85
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
DoorDash

DoorDash

San Francisco, California, US

Last Update: 09/07/2026

View Profile
628/1000Poor

At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:76,630
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SolarWinds MSP is now N-able

SolarWinds MSP is now N-able

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DoorDash

DoorDash

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SolarWinds MSP is now N-able in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

DoorDash has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SolarWinds MSP is now N-able (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SolarWinds MSP is now N-able cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DoorDash (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoorDash cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SolarWinds MSP is now N-able

SolarWinds MSP is now N-able

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SOL310081425
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SOL816082325
DoorDash

DoorDash

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
WOFAUBWALDOO1772749980
🔒 Incident : Breach
DOO5993759111725
🔒 Incident : Breach
DOO4104241112725

FAQ

Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able company and DoorDash company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able and DoorDash, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able and DoorDash, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SolarWinds MSP is now N-able or DoorDash ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SolarWinds MSP is now N-able or DoorDash ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able and DoorDash, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SolarWinds MSP is now N-able and DoorDash, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA