Comparison Overview

SolarWinds

VS

PhonePe

SolarWinds

Austin, Texas, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 600 and 649

Making IT look easy.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2,599
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

PhonePe

Green Glen Layout Road, Bengaluru East, Karnataka, 560103, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

PhonePe Group is India’s leading fintech company, proudly recognized as India’s #1 Trusted Digital Payments* Brand for three consecutive years. Our flagship product, the PhonePe app was launched in August 2016, has rapidly become the preferred consumer payments app in India. In just eight years, PhonePe has gained over 57 crore + registered users and established a digital payments acceptance network of over 4 crore+ merchants spread across Tier 2,3 cites and beyond, covering 99% of the postal codes in the country. Building on our leadership in digital payments, PhonePe Group has expanded into financial services—including insurance, lending, and wealth management—along with new consumer tech ventures such as Pincode, a hyperlocal ecommerce platform, Indus App Store - India’s first localized app store, and Share.Market- A wealth and investment platform (app & website), catering to investors and traders needs. Headquartered in India, PhonePe Group aligns its diverse portfolio of businesses with our vision We're committed to empowering every Indian by unlocking the flow of money and providing equal access to easy & secure payments and financial services.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 15,345
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solarwinds.jpeg
SolarWinds
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phonepe-internet.jpeg
PhonePe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SolarWinds
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PhonePe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

SolarWinds has 132.56% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PhonePe in 2025.

Incident History — SolarWinds (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SolarWinds cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PhonePe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PhonePe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/solarwinds.jpeg
SolarWinds
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network, User-Controlled Input (Deserialization), Improper Input Sanitization (Command Injection)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Supply Chain Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Cryptographic Weakness
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phonepe-internet.jpeg
PhonePe
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PhonePe company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SolarWinds company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SolarWinds company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas PhonePe company has not reported any.

In the current year, SolarWinds company has reported more cyber incidents than PhonePe company.

SolarWinds company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SolarWinds company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SolarWinds company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SolarWinds company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while PhonePe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SolarWinds nor PhonePe holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SolarWinds company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PhonePe company.

PhonePe company employs more people globally than SolarWinds company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither SolarWinds nor PhonePe holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SolarWinds nor PhonePe holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SolarWinds nor PhonePe holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SolarWinds nor PhonePe holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SolarWinds nor PhonePe holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SolarWinds nor PhonePe holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X