Comparison Overview
SolarWinds Small Business Tools

SolarWinds Small Business Tools
N/A
Last Update: 21/03/2026
Whether you’re part of a small or even one-man IT shop, there’s a lot on your plate every day. The challenges you face daily may require you to wear several “hats” to effectively manage your growing IT environment. We’ve been there. At SolarWinds, we’re passionate about...

Bolt
Tallinn, EE
Last Update: 12/09/2026
At Bolt, we're building a future where people don’t need to own personal cars to move around safely and conveniently. A future where people have the freedom to use transport on demand, choosing whatever vehicle's best for each occasion — be it a car, scooter, or e-bike....
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SolarWinds Small Business Tools







Bolt






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SolarWinds Small Business Tools in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Bolt has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - SolarWinds Small Business Tools (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SolarWinds Small Business Tools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bolt (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bolt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SolarWinds Small Business Tools

Bolt
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.