Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SolaborateSolaborate
VS
IBMIBM
Solaborate

Solaborate

2605 Enterprise RD E Suite 150 Clearwater, FL 33759, Clearwater, Florida, 33759, US

Last Update: 20/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.solaborate.com
750/1000Fair

The World’s Most Integrated Virtual Care Delivery Platform Hello Care powered by Solaborate is an End-to-End telehealth and virtual healthcare delivery platform comprising software, hardware and AI. Hello Care platform provides solutions Hospitals, Home Care and Prim...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IBM

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://www.ibm.com
614/1000Poor

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:341,860
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Solaborate

Solaborate

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IBM

IBM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Solaborate in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

IBM has 277.36% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Solaborate (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Solaborate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Solaborate

Solaborate

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IBM

IBM

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATTIBM1781168591
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ANTARCFLOIBM1776659058
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SIS1777847095

FAQ

Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Solaborate company and IBM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Solaborate and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Solaborate and IBM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Solaborate or IBM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Solaborate or IBM ?
Between Solaborate and IBM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Solaborate and IBM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA