Comparison Overview

Sogeti

VS

Conduent

Sogeti

145-151 Quai du Président Roosevelt,, Paris, Paris - Issy-les-Moulineaux, 92130, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Part of the Capgemini Group, Sogeti makes business value through technology for organizations that need to implement innovation at speed and want a local partner with global scale. With a hands-on culture and close proximity to its clients, Sogeti implements solutions that will help organizations work faster, better, and smarter. By combining its agility and speed of implementation through a DevOps approach, Sogeti delivers innovative solutions in quality engineering, cloud and application development, all driven by AI, data and automation. For more information please visit www.sogeti.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,384
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Conduent

100 Campus Dr, None, Florham Park, New Jersey, US, 07932
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 0 and 549

Conduent delivers digital business solutions and services spanning the commercial, government and transportation spectrum – creating valuable outcomes for its clients and the millions of people who count on them. We leverage cloud computing, artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation and advanced analytics to deliver mission-critical solutions. Through a dedicated global team of approximately 55,000 associates, process expertise and advanced technologies, our solutions and services digitally transform our clients’ operations to enhance customer experiences, improve performance, increase efficiencies and reduce costs. We drive progress in every process for our client including disbursing approximately $100 billion in government payments annually, enabling 2.3 billion customer service interactions annually, empowering millions of employees through HR services every year and processing nearly 13 million tolling transactions every day. Learn more at www.conduent.com

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 36,834
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sogeti.jpeg
Sogeti
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conduent.jpeg
Conduent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sogeti
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Conduent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sogeti in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Conduent has 640.74% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Sogeti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sogeti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Conduent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Conduent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sogeti.jpeg
Sogeti
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conduent.jpeg
Conduent
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Espionage (F5 source code theft), Financial gain (Conduent breach), Activism (hacktivist attacks on critical infrastructure)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sogeti company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Conduent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Conduent company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sogeti company has not reported any.

In the current year, Conduent company has reported more cyber incidents than Sogeti company.

Conduent company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Sogeti company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Conduent company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Sogeti company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Conduent company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sogeti company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sogeti company nor Conduent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sogeti nor Conduent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sogeti company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Conduent company.

Conduent company employs more people globally than Sogeti company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Sogeti nor Conduent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sogeti nor Conduent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sogeti nor Conduent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sogeti nor Conduent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sogeti nor Conduent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sogeti nor Conduent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H