Comparison Overview

SoftwareOne

VS

Unisys

SoftwareOne

Riedenmatt 4, Stans, CH, 6370
Last Update: 2025-12-09

SoftwareOne is a leading global software and cloud solutions provider that is redefining how companies build, buy and manage everything in the cloud. By helping clients to migrate and modernize their workloads and applications – and in parallel, to navigate and optimize the resulting software and cloud changes – SoftwareOne unlocks the value of technology. The company’s 8,900 employees are driven to deliver a portfolio of 7,500 software brands with sales and delivery capabilities in 90 countries. Headquartered in Switzerland, SoftwareOne is listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange under the ticker symbol SWON. Visit us: https://www.softwareone.com/en

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,240
Subsidiaries: 51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Unisys

801 Lakeview Drive, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, 19422, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

We are a global technology solutions company that powers breakthroughs for the world’s leading organizations. These solutions — digital workplace, cloud, applications & infrastructure, enterprise computing and business process solutions — help people overcome obstacles and not only reach their greatest potential but go beyond it. For more information about how we deliver for our clients, visit https://www.unisys.com/.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 22,741
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softwareone.jpeg
SoftwareOne
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unisys.jpeg
Unisys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SoftwareOne
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unisys
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftwareOne in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unisys in 2025.

Incident History — SoftwareOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftwareOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Unisys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unisys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softwareone.jpeg
SoftwareOne
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unisys.jpeg
Unisys
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SoftwareOne company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Unisys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Unisys company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SoftwareOne company.

In the current year, Unisys company and SoftwareOne company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Unisys company nor SoftwareOne company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Unisys company nor SoftwareOne company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Unisys company nor SoftwareOne company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SoftwareOne company nor Unisys company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SoftwareOne nor Unisys holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SoftwareOne company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Unisys company.

Unisys company employs more people globally than SoftwareOne company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither SoftwareOne nor Unisys holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SoftwareOne nor Unisys holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SoftwareOne nor Unisys holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SoftwareOne nor Unisys holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SoftwareOne nor Unisys holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SoftwareOne nor Unisys holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N