Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟
VS
Persistent SystemsPersistent Systems
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

台北市松德路171號, 台北市, 110, TW

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

SoftwareONE 是一家跨國企業,總部位於瑞士,在歐洲、北美、南美、亞太地區等多個國家設有分部。我們從事專業電腦軟體代理、服務及為客戶提供全球軟體管理的公司。SoftwareONE 不僅是微軟(Microsoft) 於歐洲、美國、南美和亞洲地區等大型客戶經銷商(LAR) ,同時也是Adobe公司在上述地區的 Adobe License Center (ALC)。SoftwareONE在全球80+個國家都設有公司和辦事處,我們的足跡遍佈世界各地,我們致力於發展全球業務,在全球,我們擁有數百位軟體授權專家和SAM專家,為客戶提供專業...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

Bhageerath, 402 E, Senapati Bapat Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411016

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.persistent.com
776/1000Fair

We are an AI-led, platform-driven Digital Engineering and Enterprise Modernization partner, combining deep technical expertise and industry experience to help our clients anticipate what’s next. Our offerings and proven solutions create a unique competitive advantage fo...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:27,562
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Persistent Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Persistent Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Persistent Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Persistent Systems

Persistent Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Persistent Systems company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Persistent Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Persistent Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 or Persistent Systems ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 or Persistent Systems ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Persistent Systems, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Persistent Systems, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA