Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟
VS
NeobpoNeobpo
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

台北市松德路171號, 台北市, 110, TW

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

SoftwareONE 是一家跨國企業,總部位於瑞士,在歐洲、北美、南美、亞太地區等多個國家設有分部。我們從事專業電腦軟體代理、服務及為客戶提供全球軟體管理的公司。SoftwareONE 不僅是微軟(Microsoft) 於歐洲、美國、南美和亞洲地區等大型客戶經銷商(LAR) ,同時也是Adobe公司在上述地區的 Adobe License Center (ALC)。SoftwareONE在全球80+個國家都設有公司和辦事處,我們的足跡遍佈世界各地,我們致力於發展全球業務,在全球,我們擁有數百位軟體授權專家和SAM專家,為客戶提供專業...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Neobpo

Neobpo

Rua Pais Leme, 14, São Paulo, SP, BR, 05424-010

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.neobpo
771/1000Fair

Somos especializados em integrar tecnologia com inteligência humana, oferecendo soluções digitais que promovem transformação e eficiência operacional. Nosso foco é gerar valor por meio de resultados reais, utilizando inteligência digital para atender às necessidades esp...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,245
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Neobpo

Neobpo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neobpo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Neobpo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neobpo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Neobpo

Neobpo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and Neobpo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Neobpo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Neobpo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 or Neobpo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 or Neobpo ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Neobpo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and Neobpo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86098
SUMMARY

ntop nDPI versions before 6.0 contain a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the ndpi_json_string_escape function that writes beyond caller-supplied buffer boundaries. Attackers can trigger the overflow by supplying crafted network packet data including TLS SNI, HTTP headers, or DNS names that reach the vulnerable function, causing heap corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-86097
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in param_set_default_file() and param_set_backup_file() functions that allows attackers to crash the autopilot process. Attackers can invoke 'param select' or 'param select-backup' commands with no path argument from any PX4 shell to trigger the crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86096
SUMMARY

PX4 Autopilot through 1.17.0 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in TemperatureCalibration::start() due to a race condition between task spawning and object deletion. Attackers can trigger the calibration process via shell commands to write to freed heap memory, corrupting unrelated objects or allocator metadata and destabilizing heap operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86095
SUMMARY

Unidata netcdf-c through 4.10.1 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in NC4_HDF5_inq_attname() that copies HDF5 attribute names into a fixed 256-byte buffer without length validation. Attackers can craft HDF5 files with oversized attribute names to overflow the destination buffer, causing memory corruption and crashes when applications enumerate attribute names.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-48019
SUMMARY

Laravel is a web application framework. Prior to versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0, a CRLF injection vulnerability in Laravel's email validation, in combination with how Symfony Mailer and Symfony Mime handle certain character sequences, may allow an unauthenticated attacker to interfere with outbound email processing in applications that send mail to user-supplied addresses. This issue has been patched in versions 12.60.0 and 13.10.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-04
UPDATED
Date2026-09-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2