Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟
VS
EPAM SystemsEPAM Systems
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

台北市松德路171號, 台北市, 110, TW

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

SoftwareONE 是一家跨國企業,總部位於瑞士,在歐洲、北美、南美、亞太地區等多個國家設有分部。我們從事專業電腦軟體代理、服務及為客戶提供全球軟體管理的公司。SoftwareONE 不僅是微軟(Microsoft) 於歐洲、美國、南美和亞洲地區等大型客戶經銷商(LAR) ,同時也是Adobe公司在上述地區的 Adobe License Center (ALC)。SoftwareONE在全球80+個國家都設有公司和辦事處,我們的足跡遍佈世界各地,我們致力於發展全球業務,在全球,我們擁有數百位軟體授權專家和SAM專家,為客戶提供專業...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EPAM Systems

EPAM Systems

41 University Drive Suite 202, Newtown, PA, US, 18940

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.epam.com
775/1000Fair

Since 1993, EPAM Systems, Inc. (NYSE: EPAM) has used its software engineering expertise to become a leading global provider of digital engineering, cloud and AI-enabled transformation services, and a leading business and experience consulting partner for global enterpri...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:63,943
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EPAM Systems

EPAM Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EPAM Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EPAM Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EPAM Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EPAM Systems

EPAM Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 company and EPAM Systems company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and EPAM Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and EPAM Systems, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 or EPAM Systems ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 or EPAM Systems ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and EPAM Systems, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SoftwareOne Taiwan 台灣碩軟 and EPAM Systems, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84483
SUMMARY

WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains an incomplete authentication bypass in encryptPass.json.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to compute valid HMAC tokens using the public site URL and current time. Attackers can forge authentication tokens by computing hash_hmac with the site's base URL as the key and submit arbitrary passwords to receive encrypted hashes, enabling offline precomputation attacks against stolen password databases.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-01
UPDATED
Date2026-09-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-84482
SUMMARY

WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get_domain() and isSameDomain() functions that fail to properly validate referer origins. Attackers can forge requests from sibling subdomains or unparseable long-gTLD origins to perform administrative ObjectYPT writes including live server configuration changes.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-01
UPDATED
Date2026-09-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84481
SUMMARY

WWBN AVideo through 30.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MobileManager plugin getConfiguration endpoint that returns sensitive configuration data to unauthenticated visitors. Attackers can send an unauthenticated GET request to plugin/MobileManager/getConfiguration.json.php to obtain TLS private key file paths, socket configuration details, platform version, and debug flags enabling further targeted attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-01
UPDATED
Date2026-09-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-84480
SUMMARY

WWBN AVideo fails to validate password recovery token expiration in userRecoverPassSave.json.php, allowing attackers to use expired tokens to reset account passwords indefinitely. Attackers who obtain a recovery token can use it at any time to change the target account's password and gain full account access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-01
UPDATED
Date2026-09-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-84479
SUMMARY

WWBN AVideo (current e01e41ecc and earlier) makes three login-time security controls depend solely on the client-supplied User-Agent header. The isAVideoEncoder()/isAVideoMobileApp() checks match HTTP_USER_AGENT against a hardcoded literal ("AVideoEncoder"/"AVideoMobileApp") with no IP check or shared secret. An attacker who submits valid credentials and sets User-Agent: AVideoEncoder bypasses two-factor authentication, skips brute-force captcha escalation, and avoids being recorded in the login/device audit history. No patch is available at the time of publication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-01
UPDATED
Date2026-09-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9