Comparison Overview

Softtek

VS

Tata Elxsi

Softtek

Ave. Constitución 3098 Col. Santa María, 6th Floor, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, MX, 64650
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1982 by a small group of entrepreneurs, Softtek started out in Mexico providing local IT services, and today is a global leader in next-generation digital solutions. The first company to introduce the Nearshore model, Softtek helps Global 2000 organizations build their digital capabilities constantly and seamlessly, from ideation and development to execution and evolution. Its entrepreneurial drive spans 20+ countries and more than 15,000 talented professionals. For more information on what we do, who we are, and career opportunities, visit www.softtek.com / Follow us on Instagram (@softtekofficial), on Twitter (@Softtek), and be our fan on Facebook www.facebook.com/softtek.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 14,071
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tata Elxsi

ITBP Road, Whitefield, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560 048
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Tata Elxsi is amongst the world’s leading providers of design and technology services across industries, including Automotive, Media & Entertainment, Communications, and Healthcare. Tata Elxsi is helping customers reimagine their products and services through design thinking and the application of digital technologies such as IoT (Internet of Things), Cloud, Mobility, Virtual Reality, and Artificial Intelligence. Tata Elxsi is truly home to a billion possibilities. We believe in opportunities for everyone - to be bold, and curious and seek to shape the future. Explore what’s possible, discover what you love to do, and find accelerated paths for growth. At Tata Elxsi, you matter.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,059
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softtek.jpeg
Softtek
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Softtek
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tata Elxsi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Softtek in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tata Elxsi in 2025.

Incident History — Softtek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Softtek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tata Elxsi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Elxsi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softtek.jpeg
Softtek
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tataelxsi.jpeg
Tata Elxsi
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Emails, Spoofed Supplier Communications, WhatsApp Scams, Human Error (Misplaced Trust)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Reputational Damage, Exploitation of Human Behavior
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Softtek company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tata Elxsi company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Tata Elxsi company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Softtek company has not reported any.

In the current year, Tata Elxsi company has reported more cyber incidents than Softtek company.

Tata Elxsi company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Softtek company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Softtek company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Tata Elxsi company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Softtek company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Softtek company nor Tata Elxsi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Softtek nor Tata Elxsi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tata Elxsi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Softtek company.

Tata Elxsi company employs more people globally than Softtek company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Softtek nor Tata Elxsi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Softtek nor Tata Elxsi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Softtek nor Tata Elxsi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Softtek nor Tata Elxsi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Softtek nor Tata Elxsi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Softtek nor Tata Elxsi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H