Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SoftBankSoftBank
VS
SoftServeSoftServe
SoftBank

SoftBank

海岸1-7-1, 港区, 105-7529, JP

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.softbank.jp
698/1000Weak

Embarking on a new stage of the Information Revolution with a "Beyond Carrier"​ strategy SoftBank Corp. (TOKYO: 9434) continues to push forward into a new stage of the Information Revolution by utilizing state-of-the-art technology such as AI, IoT, and robotics, and pl...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:4,278
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
SoftServe

SoftServe

201 W 5th Street , Austin, 78701, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.softserveinc.com
781/1000Fair

SoftServe is a premier IT consulting and digital services provider. We expand the horizon of new technologies to solve today's complex business challenges and achieve meaningful outcomes for our clients. Our boundless curiosity drives us to explore and reimagine the art...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,373
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SoftBank

SoftBank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SoftServe

SoftServe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftBank in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftServe in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SoftBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SoftServe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftServe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SoftBank

SoftBank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SOF606061225
SoftServe

SoftServe

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SoftBank company and SoftServe company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SoftBank and SoftServe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SoftBank and SoftServe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SoftBank or SoftServe ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SoftBank or SoftServe ?
Between SoftBank and SoftServe, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SoftBank and SoftServe, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3