Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Société de transport de MontréalSociété de transport de Montréal
VS
Total Quality LogisticsTotal Quality Logistics
Société de transport de Montréal

Société de transport de Montréal

800, de La Gauchetière Ouest, Montréal, H5A 1L3, CA

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.stm.info
739/1000Moderate

Quatorzième entreprise en importance au Québec, la STM assure quelque 1,4 million de déplacements par jour moyen de semaine. Elle emploie plus de 9 500 personnes, dont la moitié travaillent en contact direct avec la clientèle. En 2014, son budget s’élevait à plus de 1,3...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:3,751
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Total Quality Logistics

Total Quality Logistics

4289 Ivy Pointe Blvd, Cincinnati, Ohio, US, 45245

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

The logistics industry is a $500 billion market. With annual sales over $8 billion, Total Quality Logistics (TQL) is one of the largest freight brokerage firms in the nation. TQL connects customers with truckload freight that needs to be moved with quality carriers who ...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:16,969
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Société de transport de Montréal

Société de transport de Montréal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Total Quality Logistics

Total Quality Logistics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Société de transport de Montréal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Total Quality Logistics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Société de transport de Montréal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Société de transport de Montréal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Total Quality Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Total Quality Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Société de transport de Montréal

Société de transport de Montréal

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SOC205512222
Total Quality Logistics

Total Quality Logistics

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TOT532092125

FAQ

Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal company and Total Quality Logistics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal and Total Quality Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal and Total Quality Logistics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Société de transport de Montréal or Total Quality Logistics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Société de transport de Montréal or Total Quality Logistics ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal and Total Quality Logistics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Société de transport de Montréal and Total Quality Logistics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2