Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSSSociete Generale Securities Services - SGSS
VS
Piramal FinancePiramal Finance
Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS

Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS

17 cours Valmy, Puteaux, 92800, FR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile

Established in 17 locations worldwide with 4,000 employees, SGSS is a leading European securities services provider, recognised for the quality of its services, the expertise of its specialists, its strong European roots and the breadth of its international network. SG...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:2,142
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Piramal Finance

Piramal Finance

601, 6th Floor, , Amiti Building, Agastya Corporate Park, Kamani Junction, Opp. Fire Station, LBS Marg, Kurla (W), Mumbai, MAHARASHTRA, IN, 400070

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

Piramal Finance Limited (Formerly known as Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited), is engaged in financial services business. It provides both wholesale and retail funding opportunities within real estate and non-real estate sectors. We value your feedback, queri...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,842
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS

Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Piramal Finance

Piramal Finance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Piramal Finance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Piramal Finance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Piramal Finance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS

Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Piramal Finance

Piramal Finance

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS company and Piramal Finance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS and Piramal Finance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS and Piramal Finance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS or Piramal Finance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS or Piramal Finance ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS and Piramal Finance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Societe Generale Securities Services - SGSS and Piramal Finance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1