Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department of Social ProtectionDepartment of Social Protection
VS
France TravailFrance Travail
Department of Social Protection

Department of Social Protection

Store Street, Dublin City, D01, IE

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gov.ie/dsp
750/1000Fair

The Department of Social Protection promotes active participation in society through the provision of income supports, employment services and other services for a wide range of audiences. We serve a wide and diverse group of customers including families, people in em...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,305
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
France Travail

France Travail

1, avenue du docteur Gley, Paris, FR, 75020

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
718/1000Moderate

France Travail est un acteur majeur du marché de l’emploi en France où il s’investit pour faciliter le retour à l’emploi des demandeurs d’emploi et offrir aux entreprises des réponses adaptées à leurs besoins de recrutement. Les 55 000 collaborateurs de France Travail...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:50,801
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department of Social Protection

Department of Social Protection

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
France Travail

France Travail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Social Protection in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for France Travail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department of Social Protection (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Social Protection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - France Travail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

France Travail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department of Social Protection

Department of Social Protection

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEP201927123
France Travail

France Travail

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRA242072325
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FRA2692726102925
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
PLE3454923

FAQ

Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department of Social Protection company and France Travail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department of Social Protection and France Travail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department of Social Protection and France Travail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department of Social Protection or France Travail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department of Social Protection or France Travail ?
Between Department of Social Protection and France Travail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department of Social Protection and France Travail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA