Snyk A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Snyk
Company Information
Website:https://snyk.io/platform
Employees number:1,203
Number of followers:112,842
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:snyk.io
Snyk Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
SnykComputer and Network Security
Updated:
15/07/2026
15/07/2026
715/1000
Moderate
Ba
Snyk Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
SnykComputer and Network Security
Score locked

SnykModerate
Current Score
715Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
716
JULY 2026
715
JUNE 2026
714
MAY 2026
713
APRIL 2026
712
MARCH 2026
712
FEBRUARY 2026
710
JANUARY 2026
710
DECEMBER 2025
708
NOVEMBER 2025
707
OCTOBER 2025
706
SEPTEMBER 2025
705
JUNE 2025
760
Breach
12 Jun 2025 • Snyk
LastPass, BeyondTrust, Klue, HackerOne, Jamf, Recorded Future, Snyk, Huntress and Tanium: Klue Data Breach 2026: 200 Firms Hit via Old Credential
Klue Breach Exposes 200 Firms via Forgotten 4-Year-Old Credential
701
CRITICAL-59
JAMHUNSNYRECHACLASTANKLUBEY1784126732
Klue Breach Exposes 200 Firms via Forgotten 4-Year-Old Credential
In June 2025, a dormant credential issued by competitive-intelligence platform Klue in 2022 became the entry point for a breach affecting nearly 200 companies, including prominent cybersecurity vendors. The attack, claimed by the extortion group Icarus, exploited an unmonitored OAuth token to access Salesforce environments, underscoring the risks of neglected third-party integrations.
### What Happened?
On June 12, 2025, attackers used a compromised legacy credential originally created for a "limited pilot" to infiltrate Klue’s systems. The credential, left active for four years, granted access to OAuth tokens that Klue used to pull data from connected Salesforce instances. Once inside, the threat actors automated data exfiltration from 195–200 companies, including LastPass, BeyondTrust, Jamf, HackerOne, Recorded Future, Snyk, Tanium, and Huntress.
Klue publicly disclosed the breach on June 15, 2025, confirming data theft from an unspecified number of customers. By late June, affected firms began acknowledging the incident, with LastPass and BeyondTrust clarifying that only business contact and CRM data not core product systems were exposed.
### How the Attack Unfolded
The breach required no zero-day exploits or sophisticated malware just an overlooked credential. The attackers leveraged Klue’s OAuth tokens to access Salesforce environments en masse, demonstrating the dangers of fourth-party risk: a vendor’s vendor (Klue) becoming the weak link in a supply chain.
### Key Victims & Impact
While Klue serves sales and marketing teams, its customer base included security vendors, amplifying the breach’s irony. Confirmed victims span:
- Password management (LastPass)
- Privileged access (BeyondTrust)
- Endpoint security (Tanium, Jamf)
- Threat intelligence (Recorded Future)
- Bug bounty coordination (HackerOne)
- Application security (Snyk)
Huntress reported receiving a ransom note from the attackers via a compromised Australian email address, highlighting the group’s reliance on reused infrastructure.
### Broader Context: A Year of Supply Chain Attacks
The Klue breach coincided with a separate 2026 supply chain campaign targeting open-source security tools, including Trivy, Bitwarden, and Checkmarx. While unrelated, both incidents reflect a trend: attackers increasingly compromise trusted platforms to bypass direct defenses.
### Regulatory & Industry Reactions
- Cyber insurers are tightening scrutiny of third-party integrations, particularly OAuth token hygiene.
- Security vendors on the victim list face heightened procurement questions from enterprise buyers.
- Regulators are paying closer attention to software supply chain risks, though the Klue breach limited to business data may not trigger major notifications.
### Lessons from the Breach
The incident mirrors the 2025 Salesloft Drift breach, where stolen OAuth tokens compromised 700+ Salesforce environments. Both cases reveal a critical gap: point-in-time vendor assessments fail to catch dormant credentials. Mitigation requires:
- Automated expiration for pilot credentials.
- Minimum-scoped OAuth grants (avoiding broad CRM access).
- Recurring token audits to identify stale integrations.
As of June 2026, only ~15 of the estimated 200 affected firms have publicly confirmed exposure, with more expected to disclose as investigations continue. The breach serves as a stark reminder that identity and credential management not just perimeter defenses are central to modern cybersecurity.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Snyk ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on Snyk's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Snyk ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view Snyk's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?