Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Snap Inc.

Snap Inc. Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

snap.com

Snap is a technology company. We believe the camera presents the greatest opportunity to improve the way people live and communicate. Snap contributes to human progress by empowering people to express themselves, live in the moment, learn about the world, and have fun together. The Company’s three core products are Snapchat, a visual messaging app that enhances your relationships with friends, family, and the world; Lens Studio, an augmented reality platform that powers AR across Snapchat and other services; and its AR glasses, Spectacles.


Snap Inc. A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Snap Inc.
Company Information
Website:https://careers.snap.com/
Employees number:8,406
Number of followers:537,234
NAICS:5112
Industry Type:Software Development
Homepage:snap.com
Snap Inc. Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 600 and 649
logo
Snap Inc.Software Development
Updated:
31/03/2026
602/1000
Poor
Caa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Snap Inc. Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Snap Inc.Software Development
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.Poor
Current Score
602Caa (POOR)
01000
6 incidents
-55 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
611Before Incident
MAY 2026
606Before Incident
APRIL 2026
605Before Incident
MARCH 2026
656Before Incident
Breach
23 Mar 2026Snap Inc.
Snap: Smart glasses as an enterprise risk: What CIOs should know

Smart Glasses Emerge as a Growing Enterprise Security Threat

601After Incident
CRITICAL-55
SNA1774298870
Smart Glasses Emerge as a Growing Enterprise Security Threat Smart glasses once a niche technology have rapidly evolved into a significant risk for enterprises, exposing organizations to data breaches, compliance violations, and reputational damage. With global shipments surging 210% in 2024, models like Meta Ray-Bans and Snap Spectacles now blend seamlessly into everyday wear, enabling covert recording and real-time AI analysis without detection. The primary concern lies in their ability to capture sensitive data, intellectual property, and confidential conversations in high-risk environments such as boardrooms, R&D labs, and healthcare facilities. Subtle recording indicators, like small LED lights, are easily overlooked, and security measures can be bypassed through aftermarket modifications. This creates compliance risks under GDPR, HIPAA, and biometric privacy laws, with potential legal penalties and loss of trust among customers and employees. The threat extends beyond accidental exposure. Smart glasses can be exploited for reconnaissance, harassment, or even targeted data theft. A proof-of-concept tool, I-XRAY, demonstrated how hackers could use Meta Ray-Bans to extract personal details including addresses and Social Security numbers via facial recognition and public databases. Meanwhile, reports reveal that Meta subcontractors have accessed unblurred, sensitive content from smart glasses, raising further privacy concerns. Detection tools like Nearby Glasses an Android app that scans for Bluetooth signatures from smart glasses offer limited protection but highlight growing unease. Enterprises face operational risks, including unauthorized data transmission to third-party servers, lack of authentication controls, and unrestricted AI-driven data collection. Industries with strict compliance requirements, such as healthcare, defense, and legal sectors, are particularly vulnerable. Recent cases underscore the real-world impact. U.S. Border Patrol and ICE agents have been documented wearing Meta smart glasses, raising concerns about facial recognition integration with government databases. As adoption grows, organizations must address the expanding attack surface posed by these always-on surveillance devices.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach, Compliance Violation, Privacy Violation
MOTIVATION
Data theft, Reconnaissance, Harassment, Intellectual property theft, Compliance violations
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Sensitive data, Intellectual property, Confidential conversations, Personal details (addresses, Social Security numbers), Biometric dataSystems Affected: Smart glasses (Meta Ray-Bans, Snap Spectacles), Third-party servers, Facial recognition systemsOperational Impact: Unauthorized data transmission, Lack of authentication controls, Compliance risks under GDPR, HIPAA, and biometric privacy lawsBrand Reputation Impact: Loss of trust among customers and employees, Reputational damageLegal Liabilities: Potential legal penalties under GDPR, HIPAA, and biometric privacy lawsIdentity Theft Risk: High (exposure of Social Security numbers and personal details)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Sensitive data, Intellectual property, Confidential conversations, Personal details (addresses, Social Security numbers), Biometric dataSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information, biometric data, confidential business information)Data Exfiltration: Yes (unauthorized transmission to third-party servers, potential sale on dark web)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (addresses, Social Security numbers, facial recognition data)
FEBRUARY 2026
652Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
650Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
664Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
662Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
643Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
657Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
637Before Incident
JULY 2025
634Before Incident
MAY 2025
743Before Incident
Breach
18 May 2025Snap Inc.
Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram and Roblox: 184 million logins for Instagram, Roblox, Facebook, Snapchat, and more exposed online

Exposure of 184 Million Unique Login Credentials via Unsecured Database

627After Incident
CRITICAL-116
FACSNAINSROB1766549037
Massive Infostealer Database Exposes 184 Million Credentials in Latest Cybersecurity Threat Cybersecurity researcher Jeremiah Fowler recently uncovered an unsecured database containing over 184 million unique login credentials, underscoring the escalating danger posed by infostealer malware. The exposed data—including emails, passwords, and authorization URLs—spanned a wide range of services, from Microsoft, Facebook, and Instagram to financial institutions, healthcare portals, and government accounts. Unlike traditional data breaches, this trove was likely compiled by infostealers, a type of malware designed to silently extract credentials from infected devices. These malicious programs harvest data from browsers, email clients, messaging apps, and even cryptocurrency wallets, often spreading via phishing emails, malicious websites, or cracked software. The database’s removal from public access does not mitigate the broader threat, as infostealers continue to operate at scale. The sheer volume of exposed credentials suggests millions of individuals may be affected, though the number of unique victims is likely lower due to multiple accounts per user. Modern infostealers go beyond simple password theft, capturing autofill data, cookies, screenshots, and keystrokes, enabling attackers to bypass security measures and launch credential stuffing attacks, account takeovers, identity theft, and targeted phishing campaigns. This incident highlights the pervasive nature of infostealer infections, which allow cybercriminals to build detailed profiles of victims’ digital lives. While the exposed database has been secured, the underlying threat remains, with malware like Lumma Stealer (recently disrupted by authorities) representing just one of many sophisticated variants in circulation.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure
MOTIVATION
Financial gain, identity theft, corporate espionage, credential stuffing attacks
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 184 million unique login credentials (emails, passwords, authorization URLs)Systems Affected: Infected devices (browsers, email clients, messaging apps, crypto wallets)Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for affected services and usersIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
EmailsPasswordsAuthorization URLsAutofill dataCookiesScreenshotsKeystrokesNumber Of Records Exposed: 184 millionSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information, login credentials)Data Exfiltration: Yes (via infostealers)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Cyber Attack
18 May 2025Snap Inc.
Northeastern University and Snapchat: Illinois man pleads guilty to hacking hundreds of Snapchat accounts to steal nude photos

Illinois Man Pleads Guilty to Mass Snapchat Hacking Scheme Targeting Hundreds of Women

627After Incident
CRITICAL-116
NORSNA1770407892
Illinois Man Pleads Guilty to Mass Snapchat Hacking Scheme Targeting Hundreds of Women A 27-year-old Illinois man, Kyle Svara of Oswego, has pleaded guilty to multiple federal charges stemming from a large-scale hacking campaign that compromised the Snapchat accounts of approximately 600 women and girls. Svara faces up to 32 years in prison for aggravated identity theft, wire fraud, computer fraud, conspiracy, and false statements related to child pornography, with sentencing set for May 18. Between 2020 and 2021, Svara used social engineering tactics to deceive victims into handing over security access codes by posing as a Snapchat representative. He successfully breached at least 59 accounts, downloading and distributing nude or semi-nude images, which he sold online or traded on internet forums. Svara also monetized his methods, offering hacking services to others for a fee. One of his clients was Steve Waithe, a former track and field coach at Northeastern University, who hired Svara to hack the accounts of women on the team and personal acquaintances. Waithe was previously sentenced to five years in prison for wire fraud and cyberstalking. Svara’s targets included women in Plainfield, Illinois, and students at Colby College in Maine. During the investigation, Svara initially lied to authorities about his involvement in accessing or distributing child sexual abuse material. The FBI and DOJ have encouraged potential victims to come forward. The case follows a separate 2023 indictment of a former University of Michigan assistant football coach, Connor Weiss, who hacked into student athlete databases at over 100 colleges, accessing medical records of 150,000 individuals. Weiss also targeted the social media and cloud storage accounts of more than 2,000 athletes primarily female seeking private images based on their athletic history and appearance.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Hacking, Identity Theft, Data Breach, Cyberstalking
MOTIVATION
Financial gain, distribution of explicit content, cyberstalking
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Nude or semi-nude images, personal account dataSystems Affected: Snapchat accountsLegal Liabilities: Federal charges (aggravated identity theft, wire fraud, computer fraud, conspiracy, false statements related to child pornography)Identity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Nude or semi-nude images, personally identifiable informationNumber Of Records Exposed: At least 59 accounts breached (600 targeted)Sensitivity Of Data: High (explicit content, personal data)Data Exfiltration: Yes (images distributed and sold online)File Types Exposed: Images (nude/semi-nude)Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (account access details)
FEBRUARY 2021
733Before Incident
Breach
01 Feb 2021Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.: Illinois man charged with hacking Snapchat accounts to steal nude photos

Phishing Operation Targeting Snapchat Accounts to Steal Private Photos

673After Incident
CRITICAL-60
SNA1767973005
Illinois Man Charged in Large-Scale Snapchat Hacking Scheme Targeting Hundreds of Women U.S. prosecutors have charged 26-year-old Kyle Svara of Illinois with orchestrating a phishing operation that compromised nearly 600 Snapchat accounts between May 2020 and February 2021. Svara allegedly used social engineering tactics to obtain victims' emails, phone numbers, and usernames, then impersonated Snapchat representatives to trick targets into sharing access codes. Of the 4,500 individuals contacted, approximately 570 had their credentials stolen, with Svara accessing at least 59 accounts without authorization to download private images. After gaining access, Svara advertised his hacking services on platforms like Reddit, offering to breach accounts for clients or trade stolen content. Court documents reveal he directed potential collaborators to encrypted messaging app Kik for further communication. One of his clients, former Northeastern University track and field coach Steve Waithe, hired Svara to hack the accounts of Northeastern students and athletes. Waithe was sentenced in March 2024 to five years in prison for sextortion, cyberstalking, and cyber fraud after targeting 128 women. In addition to paid hacking jobs, Svara independently targeted students at Colby College in Maine and women in Plainfield, Illinois. He now faces multiple federal charges, including aggravated identity theft, wire fraud, computer fraud, and making false statements related to child pornography. If convicted, he could face a mandatory minimum two-year sentence for identity theft, with potential penalties of up to 20 years for wire fraud and additional prison time for other charges. Svara is scheduled to appear in federal court in Boston on February 4th. Federal investigators continue to seek information from potential victims.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing, Social Engineering, Identity Theft, Data Theft
MOTIVATION
Financial gain, Sextortion, Cyberstalking, Personal exploitation
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Private photos, personal information (emails, phone numbers, Snapchat usernames)Systems Affected: Snapchat accountsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage to Snapchat (impersonation of representatives)Legal Liabilities: Aggravated identity theft, wire fraud, computer fraud, false statements related to child pornographyIdentity Theft Risk: High (victims' personal information and private content exposed)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Private photos, personally identifiable information (emails, phone numbers, Snapchat usernames)Number Of Records Exposed: 570+ accounts, 59+ accounts with downloaded contentSensitivity Of Data: High (private, compromising images)Data Exfiltration: Yes (stolen content sold or traded online)File Types Exposed: Images (private photos)Personally Identifiable Information: Emails, phone numbers, Snapchat usernames
FEBRUARY 2018
750Before Incident
Breach
01 Feb 2018Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.

Snapchat Phishing Attack

681After Incident
HIGH-69
SNA1566622
A phishing attack scored credentials for more than 50,000 Snapchat users along with their usernames and passwords. The attack appeared to be connected to a previous incident that the company believed to have been coordinated from the Dominican Republic. Snapchat had reset the majority of the accounts. But for some period of time, thousands of Snapchat account credentials were available on a public website.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Phishing
MOTIVATION
Credential theft
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Usernames and passwords
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Usernames and passwords
FEBRUARY 2016
783Before Incident
Breach
26 Feb 2016Snap Inc.
Snapchat, Inc.

Snapchat Data Breach

730After Incident
HIGH-53
SNA122072825
The California Office of the Attorney General reported that Snapchat, Inc. experienced a data breach on February 26, 2016, due to an email phishing scam leading to the improper disclosure of payroll information for some current and former employees. The reported date of the breach notification is March 4, 2016. Specific details about the number of individuals affected were not provided, and the types of information compromised include names, Snapchat employee IDs, Social Security numbers, and wage information.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Breach
IMPACT
namesSnapchat employee IDsSocial Security numberswage information
DATA BREACH
namesSnapchat employee IDsSocial Security numberswage informationSensitivity Of Data: High

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Snap Inc. ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Snap Inc.'s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Snap Inc. ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Snap Inc.'s profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
Snap Inc. Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo