Comparison Overview
Snap Inc.
Snap Inc.
2772 Donald Douglas Loop N, Santa Monica, California, US, 90405
Last Update: 12/08/2026
Snap is a technology company. We believe the camera presents the greatest opportunity to improve the way people live and communicate. Snap contributes to human progress by empowering people to express themselves, live in the moment, learn about the world, and have fun t...
Intuit
2700 Coast Ave, Mountain View, 94043, US
Last Update: 23/09/2026
Intuit is a global technology platform that helps our customers and communities overcome their most important financial challenges. Serving millions of customers worldwide with TurboTax, QuickBooks, Credit Karma and Mailchimp, we believe that everyone should have the op...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Snap Inc.
Intuit
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Snap Inc. has 90.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Intuit has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Snap Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Snap Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Intuit (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Intuit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Snap Inc.
Intuit
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.