Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SelPlusSelPlus
VS
TDCXTDCX
SelPlus

SelPlus

Taguspark, Edifício Qualidade, C2-1A, Porto Salvo, Lisboa, PT, 2740-120

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.selplus.com
751/1000Fair

Com início de atividade em 2002, a SelPlus agora é Smollan e conta com mais de duas décadas de experiência na criação, montagem e gestão de operações comerciais. A nossa missão é oferecer às empresas a excelência em serviços de gestão comercial, através da aplicação de...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:138
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TDCX

TDCX

750D Chai Chee Road, Singapore, SG, 469000

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tdcx.com
783/1000Fair

Singapore-headquartered TDCX provides transformative digital CX solutions, enabling world-leading and disruptive brands to acquire new customers, to build customer loyalty, and to protect their online communities. TDCX helps clients achieve their customer experience a...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:16,508
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SelPlus

SelPlus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TDCX

TDCX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SelPlus in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TDCX in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SelPlus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SelPlus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TDCX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TDCX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SelPlus

SelPlus

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TDCX

TDCX

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SelPlus company and TDCX company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SelPlus and TDCX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SelPlus and TDCX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SelPlus or TDCX ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SelPlus or TDCX ?
Between SelPlus and TDCX, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SelPlus and TDCX, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2