Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Smith+NephewSmith+Nephew
VS
StrykerStryker
Smith+Nephew

Smith+Nephew

5 Hatters Lane, Watford, Hertfordshire, GB, WD18 8YE

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.smith-nephew.com
790/1000Fair

Smith+Nephew is a global medical technology company. We design and manufacture technology that takes the limits off living. We support healthcare professionals to return their patients to health and mobility, helping them to perform at their fullest potential. From our...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:18,909
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Stryker

Stryker

2825 Airview Boulevard, Kalamazoo, 49002, US

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.stryker.com
494/1000Critical

Stryker is a global leader in medical technologies and, together with our customers, we are driven to make healthcare better. We offer innovative products and services in MedSurg, Neurotechnology and Orthopaedics that help improve patient and healthcare outcomes. Alongs...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:51,473
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
17
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Smith+Nephew

Smith+Nephew

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stryker

Stryker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smith+Nephew in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Stryker has 1566.67% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Smith+Nephew (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smith+Nephew cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stryker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stryker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Smith+Nephew

Smith+Nephew

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Stryker

Stryker

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1787430281
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1783982145
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STR1779337852

FAQ

Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Smith+Nephew company and Stryker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Smith+Nephew and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Smith+Nephew and Stryker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Smith+Nephew or Stryker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Smith+Nephew or Stryker ?
Between Smith+Nephew and Stryker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Smith+Nephew and Stryker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-100739
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in mathurvishal CloudClassroom-PHP-Project up to 5dadec098bfbbf3300d60c3494db3fb95b66e7be. This impacts an unknown function of the file viewresult.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument seno results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94408
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94400
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94399
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-94398
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Elasticsearch can lead denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-26
UPDATED
Date2026-09-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES