Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, FursacSMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac
VS
TapestryTapestry
SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

49, rue Etienne Marcel, 75001, Paris, undefined, FR

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://www.smcp.com/
852/1000Very Good

SMCP is worldwide and cosmopolitan. With four Brands, 6 800 passionate and responsible entrepreneurs, and over 1 730 points of sale in 47 countries, our ambition is to become the global leader in accessible luxury. Made of passion and high standards, we dedicate our c...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:5,431
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tapestry

Tapestry

10 Hudson Yards, New York, New York, US, 10001

Last Update: 29/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tapestry.com/
811/1000Good

Our global house of brands unites the magic of Coach and Kate Spade New York. By intertwining different people and ideas, we push ourselves in our work and expand the bounds of possibility. Learn about our iconic brands: tapestry.com/our-brands We’ve grown by finding p...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:19,167
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tapestry

Tapestry

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tapestry in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tapestry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tapestry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tapestry

Tapestry

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Tapestry company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Tapestry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Tapestry, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac or Tapestry ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac or Tapestry ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Tapestry, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Tapestry, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53646
SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.5.6 through 0.7.2, when a `ClientPasswordReset` record already exists for a client (from a previous unexpired reset request), subsequent calls to the `reset_password` guest API endpoint reuse the existing token instead of generating a new one. The 15-minute validity window is anchored to the first request's `created_at` timestamp, not the time of the most recent email. An attacker who obtained the original reset link remains able to use it even after the victim requests a new reset, because the original token is never invalidated or rotated. Version 0.8.0 patches the issue. Some workarounds are available. Configure a reverse proxy (e.g., Nginx, Apache, Cloudflare) to apply per-IP rate limiting to the `/client/reset-password` endpoint to minimize the window of opportunity, and/or manually clear expired `client_password_reset` records from the database after a client reports a suspected compromise.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-06
UPDATED
Date2026-07-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53645
SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions prior to 0.8.0 allow a low-privileged staff account to grant arbitrary module permissions to itself through the admin API, resulting in persistent privilege escalation. A staff user that only has `staff.create_and_edit_staff` can call `/api/admin/staff/permissions_update` targeting their own account and write any permission structure, bypassing the intended role-based access control boundary. Version 0.8.0 patches the issue. Some workarounds are available. Restrict the `staff.create_and_edit_staff` permission to only highly trusted staff members and/or use a reverse proxy or WAF to restrict access to `/api/admin/staff/permissions_update` to specific trusted roles.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-06
UPDATED
Date2026-07-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53644
SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions 0.5.3 through 0.7.2 allow authenticated clients to both read and reset API key service secrets for orders that are no longer in an `active` state (e.g., `suspended`, `canceled`). The root cause is missing order-state validation in two client API endpoints, despite an `isActive()` helper already existing in the `Serviceapikey` module and the frontend UI correctly gating access on `order.status == 'active'`. Version 0.8.0 contains a fix. Some workarounds are available. If the `Serviceapikey` module is not needed, uninstall it to remove the affected endpoints. One may also use a reverse proxy or WAF to restrict access to `/api/client/order/service` and `/api/client/serviceapikey/reset` based on application-level order-state logic.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-06
UPDATED
Date2026-07-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53643
SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. Versions prior to 0.8.0 allow low-privileged staff accounts to perform unauthorized actions via admin API endpoints. The root cause is a combination of the `can_always_access` module flag (which grants all staff access to certain modules) and insufficient permission checks or unsafe parameter handling on individual endpoints. Version 0.8.0 contains a fix. Some workarounds are available. Restrict staff accounts to only those who need access to sensitive settings and/or use a reverse proxy or WAF to restrict access to the affected endpoints to trusted IP addresses or higher-privilege roles.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-06
UPDATED
Date2026-07-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53642
SUMMARY

FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.5.6 through 0.7.2, when the "Require Email Confirmation" setting is enabled, a logged-in client with an unverified email address (`email_approved = 0`) can access all client-area pages (e.g. `/client/balance`, `/client/order/list`, `/client/invoice`) and read real account data, including wallet balances and transaction history. The API-side enforcement correctly restricts unverified clients to only profile-related endpoints, but the page-side enforcement is overly permissive, allowing any request whose path starts with `/client`. Version 0.8.0 contains a fix. No known workarounds that don't involve modifying the source code are available.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-06
UPDATED
Date2026-07-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA