Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, FursacSMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac
VS
CoachCoach
SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

49, rue Etienne Marcel, 75001, Paris, undefined, FR

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
http://www.smcp.com/
852/1000Very Good

SMCP is worldwide and cosmopolitan. With four Brands, 6 800 passionate and responsible entrepreneurs, and over 1 730 points of sale in 47 countries, our ambition is to become the global leader in accessible luxury. Made of passion and high standards, we dedicate our c...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:5,431
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Coach

Coach

10 Hudson Yards, New York, NY, US, 10001

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coach.com
793/1000Fair

Coach was founded in 1941 as a family-run workshop. In a Manhattan loft, six artisans handcrafted a collection of leather goods using skills handed down from generation to generation. Discerning consumers soon began to seek out the quality and unique nature of Coach cra...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:12,832
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Coach

Coach

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coach in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Coach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Coach

Coach

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac company and Coach company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Coach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Coach, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac or Coach ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac or Coach ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Coach, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SMCP – Sandro, Maje, Claudie Pierlot, Fursac and Coach, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-112112
SUMMARY

An IPv6 FlowSpec validation bypass in the CZ.NIC BIRD Internet Routing Daemon allows an established BGP peer to inject FlowSpec rules matching destinations outside the address space authorized by the unicast-route validation procedure. With validation enabled on the receiving flow6 channel, BIRD fails to reject a destination prefix component with a nonzero offset, contrary to RFC 8956 section 5. It validates a reconstructed prefix with zero-filled skipped bits, although the original FlowSpec component can match a broader set of IPv6 addresses. Given a suitable unicast route from the peer, the rule can pass validation and, where export policy permits, be propagated to downstream peers. Downstream enforcement may cause unauthorized traffic filtering or redirection.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-112111
SUMMARY

The Bootstrap Shortcodes plugin for WordPress before 3.4.6 is vulnerable to stored XSS via the id attribute of the [bs_tcontent] shortcode. The bs_tcontent() shortcode handler in inc/bs_tabs.php emits the id attribute value into an unquoted HTML attribute. esc_attr() is applied, but it does not encode space characters, so a space in the supplied value terminates the attribute and any following text is parsed as additional HTML attributes, including JavaScript event handlers. This allows authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to inject arbitrary web script that executes in the browser of any user who views the page and interacts with the injected element.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-112029
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in diem-project diem up to 5.1.3. This affects an unknown part of the file lib/model/doctrine/PluginDmUser.class.php of the component SHA1 Handler. Such manipulation of the argument salt/password leads to password hash with insufficient computational effort. The attack needs to be performed locally. The attack requires a high level of complexity. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 1.0
Complexity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-112028
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in light0011 cms c774dce31c6df0055568a8d5c53d964d99be199d/f72cf46f601efb2a0618c3814cc2f61380b38930. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file App/Home/Controller/VoteController.class.php of the component Vote Handler. This manipulation of the argument X-Requested-With causes business logic errors. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-112027
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in light0011 cms c774dce31c6df0055568a8d5c53d964d99be199d/f72cf46f601efb2a0618c3814cc2f61380b38930. Affected by this vulnerability is the function file_exists of the file Public/Home/js/uploadify/check-exists.php of the component Uploadify. The manipulation of the argument filename results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-18
UPDATED
Date2026-10-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9