Comparison Overview
PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk
Menara SMBC-Jl. Dr. Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung Kav. 5.5 – 5.6, Jakarta 12950, Jakarta Selatan, 12950, ID
Last Update: 01/04/2026
With a renewed vision for growth and innovation, we rebranded as PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk (SMBC Indonesia) in 2024, formerly known as PT Bank BTPN Tbk. This rebranding reflects our response to the dynamic changes, allowing us to consolidate our strengths and deliver e...

Santander
Avenida de Cantabria S/N, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, ES, 28660
Last Update: 05/08/2026
Banco Santander (SAN SM) is a leading commercial bank, founded in 1857 and headquartered in Spain and one of the largest banks in the world by market capitalization. The group’s activities are consolidated into five global businesses: Retail & Commercial Banking, Openba...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk







Santander






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
Santander has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Santander (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Santander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

Santander
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.