Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia TbkPT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk
VS
SantanderSantander
PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

Menara SMBC-Jl. Dr. Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung Kav. 5.5 – 5.6, Jakarta 12950, Jakarta Selatan, 12950, ID

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.smbci.com/
783/1000Fair

With a renewed vision for growth and innovation, we rebranded as PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk (SMBC Indonesia) in 2024, formerly known as PT Bank BTPN Tbk. This rebranding reflects our response to the dynamic changes, allowing us to consolidate our strengths and deliver e...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:11,211
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Santander

Santander

Avenida de Cantabria S/N, Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, ES, 28660

Last Update: 05/08/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.santander.com
682/1000Weak

Banco Santander (SAN SM) is a leading commercial bank, founded in 1857 and headquartered in Spain and one of the largest banks in the world by market capitalization. The group’s activities are consolidated into five global businesses: Retail & Commercial Banking, Openba...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:130,079
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Santander

Santander

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Santander has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Santander (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Santander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Santander

Santander

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591
🔒 Incident : Breach
BANSNOTIC1771979968
🔒 Incident : Breach
23A1764346412

FAQ

Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk company and Santander company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk and Santander, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk and Santander, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk or Santander ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk or Santander ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk and Santander, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between PT Bank SMBC Indonesia Tbk and Santander, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9