Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SmartestEnergy UKSmartestEnergy UK
VS
ACCIONAACCIONA
SmartestEnergy UK

SmartestEnergy UK

7 Westferry Circus, London, England, E14 4HD, GB

Last Update: 28/11/2025

View Profile
754/1000Fair

We’re one of the UK’s leading purchasers of independently generated renewable electricity and a licensed energy supplier. This gives us valuable experience in providing commercial agreements across many different sectors.

NAICS:221
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:52
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ACCIONA

ACCIONA

Avenida de la Gran Vía de Hortaleza, Madrid, 28033, ES

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.acciona.com
739/1000Moderate

ACCIONA champions a different way of doing business: Business as Unusual, delivering benefits far beyond the corporate realm. Driven by the ambition to leave a positive legacy for society and design a better planet, we lead in developing solutions in renewable energy,...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:34,637
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SmartestEnergy UK

SmartestEnergy UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ACCIONA

ACCIONA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SmartestEnergy UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

ACCIONA has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SmartestEnergy UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SmartestEnergy UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ACCIONA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACCIONA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SmartestEnergy UK

SmartestEnergy UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ACCIONA

ACCIONA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ACCMETCIT1788444028

FAQ

Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK company and ACCIONA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK and ACCIONA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK and ACCIONA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SmartestEnergy UK or ACCIONA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SmartestEnergy UK or ACCIONA ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK and ACCIONA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SmartestEnergy UK and ACCIONA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8