Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Smart InsurTech AGSmart InsurTech AG
VS
HUB InternationalHUB International
Smart InsurTech AG

Smart InsurTech AG

Heidestraße 8, Berlin, 10557, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
721/1000Moderate

Versicherungsplattform für integrierte Daten & digitalisierte Prozesse Aufgabe Wir haben das Ziel, als neutraler Plattformanbieter eine echte digitale Wertschöpfung in der Versicherungsbranche zu schaffen. Dafür bieten wir eine webbasierte Plattform für Versicherungs...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:84
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
HUB International

HUB International

300 North LaSalle, 17th Floor, Chicago, IL, US, 60654

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Hi, we’re HUB. We advise businesses and individuals on how to reach their goals. When you partner with us, you’re at the center of a vast network of risk, insurance, employee benefits, retirement and wealth management specialists that bring clarity to a changing world ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:16,164
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Smart InsurTech AG

Smart InsurTech AG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HUB International

HUB International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart InsurTech AG in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HUB International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Smart InsurTech AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart InsurTech AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HUB International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HUB International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Smart InsurTech AG

Smart InsurTech AG

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SMA447823
HUB International

HUB International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HUB752072525

FAQ

Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG company and HUB International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG and HUB International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG and HUB International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Smart InsurTech AG or HUB International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Smart InsurTech AG or HUB International ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG and HUB International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Smart InsurTech AG and HUB International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA