Comparison Overview

SlideTeam

VS

ZS

SlideTeam

1350 Avenue of the Americas, New York, 10019, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://slideteam.net

SlideTeam-Your presentation partner for the AI age. Our platform offers the world’s most extensive library of professional PowerPoint templates, along with design support and AI automation, to help you present faster, better, and with less effort. Over 2M templates, slides, and diagrams for every use case Custom content and design services tailored to your brand AI-powered presentation generator: go from idea to deck in a minute Helping teams craft compelling content, design smarter, and present faster.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 115
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

ZS

1560 Sherman Avenue, Evanston, IL, US, 60201
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zs.com

ZS is a management consulting and technology firm that partners with companies to improve life and how we live it. We transform ideas into impact by bringing together data, science, technology and human ingenuity to deliver better outcomes for all. Founded in 1983, ZS has more than 13,000 employees in over 35 offices worldwide. To learn more, visit www.zs.com/ At ZS, our mission is to inspire each other to bring our unique perspective and experience to work each day. When you join our firm, you have access to a wealth of community groups to support you, energize you and inspire you to bring your authentic self to work each day.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 18,004
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slide-team.jpeg
SlideTeam
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zs-associates.jpeg
ZS
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SlideTeam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ZS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SlideTeam in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZS in 2025.

Incident History — SlideTeam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SlideTeam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ZS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slide-team.jpeg
SlideTeam
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zs-associates.jpeg
ZS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ZS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SlideTeam company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SlideTeam company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ZS company has not reported any.

In the current year, ZS company and SlideTeam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ZS company nor SlideTeam company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SlideTeam company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other ZS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ZS company nor SlideTeam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SlideTeam company nor ZS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SlideTeam nor ZS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SlideTeam company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ZS company.

ZS company employs more people globally than SlideTeam company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither SlideTeam nor ZS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor ZS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor ZS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor ZS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor ZS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SlideTeam nor ZS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References