Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Škoda AutoŠkoda Auto
VS
PACCARPACCAR
Škoda Auto

Škoda Auto

Václava Klementa 869, Mladá Boleslav, 293 60, CZ

Last Update: 12/05/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.skoda-career.com
576/1000Very Poor

Since 1895, we have been creating progressive contemporary vehicles. This approach was first applied to bicycles, followed by motorcycles and finally cars. For more than 125 years, we have combined design, the latest technology, functionality and innovation in everythin...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:9,616
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
PACCAR

PACCAR

777 106th Ave NE, Bellevue, 98004, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.paccar.com
809/1000Good

PACCAR is a global technology leader in the design, manufacture and customer support of premium light-, medium- and heavy-duty trucks under the Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF nameplates. PACCAR also designs and manufactures advanced diesel engines, provides financial servi...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:19,085
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Škoda Auto

Škoda Auto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PACCAR

PACCAR

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Škoda Auto has 57.45% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PACCAR in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Škoda Auto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Škoda Auto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PACCAR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PACCAR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Škoda Auto

Škoda Auto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SKO1778503186
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEASKOBENPORVOLAUTVOL1770202467
🔒 Incident : Breach
SKOJLRREN1778610419
PACCAR

PACCAR

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Škoda Auto company and PACCAR company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Škoda Auto and PACCAR, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Škoda Auto and PACCAR, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Škoda Auto or PACCAR ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Škoda Auto or PACCAR ?
Between Škoda Auto and PACCAR, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Škoda Auto and PACCAR, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9