Comparison Overview
Skanova
Skanova
N/A
Last Update: 27/03/2026
På Skanova får du arbeta med något av det viktigaste som finns. Att ge människor möjligheten att kommunicera med varandra, oavsett plats eller avstånd. Vi äger och driver Sveriges största koppar- och fibernät. Våra kunder är Sveriges operatörer, som i sin tur ger både f...
Tata Communications
Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai, 400070, IN
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Tata Communications is a digital ecosystem enabler that powers today’s fast-growing digital economy. We enable the digital transformation of enterprises globally, including 300 of the Fortune 500. We carry around 30% of the world’s internet routes and connects businesse...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Skanova
Tata Communications
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Skanova in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Communications in 2026.
Incident History - Skanova (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Skanova cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Skanova
Tata Communications
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A flaw has been found in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. This issue affects the function system of the file /cgi-bin/mbox-config?section=ping_config of the component API Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument destination causes os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability was detected in activepieces up to 0.83.0. This vulnerability affects the function handleUrlFile in the library packages/server/engine/src/lib/variables/processors/file.ts of the component File URL Handler. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A security vulnerability has been detected in Radware Cyber Controller up to 10.11.0. This affects an unknown part of the component HTML Report Generation. The manipulation leads to HTML injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A weakness has been identified in kortix-ai suna up to 0.8.38. Affected by this issue is the function router.replace/router.push of the file apps/frontend/src/app/auth/page.tsx of the component Auth Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument returnURL can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 0.8.39 can resolve this issue. This patch is called f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The researcher explains: "The issue was fixed in v0.8.39 without notifying the wider user base via a security disclosure."
- https://gist.github.com/TrebledJ/fe7241910ac0aaeff86243fc88e9ffed
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/commit/f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/releases/tag/v0.8.39
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-12811
- https://vuldb.com/submit/837175
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605/cti
A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6478AC V2 1.23. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mp of the file /goform/mp of the component POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument command results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.