Comparison Overview

SK Telecom Americas

VS

BT Group

SK Telecom Americas

150 Mathilda Place, Suite 450, Sunnyvale, CA, US, 94086
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 600 and 649

SK Telecom America (SKTA) is focused on the future and is hard at work developing what’s next. Our intention is to be the leader in providing innovative experiences in the convergence world. We are driving innovation and globalization by: * Developing new growth businesses * Providing differentiated customer experiences * Spreading innovation to global markets Located in Silicon Valley, California, SKTA is part of South Korea's largest telecommunications company and a global Information and Communications Technology (ICT) leader. Want to learn more about our businesses? Take a look at what we're creating: http://www.skta.com

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

BT Group

One Braham, London, undefined, E1 8EE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 700 and 749

We’re one of the world’s leading communications services companies. At BT Group, the solutions we sell are integral to modern life. Our purpose is as simple as it is ambitious: we connect for good. There are no limits to what people can do when they connect. And as technology changes our world, connections are becoming even more important to everyday life. Today, that’s truer than ever. The connections we make are helping solve the world’s biggest challenges such as the global pandemic, climate change and cyber security. Through the power of technology, we’re supporting customers to live, work and play together better.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 75,585
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sk-telecom-americas.jpeg
SK Telecom Americas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bt.jpeg
BT Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SK Telecom Americas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BT Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

SK Telecom Americas has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BT Group in 2025.

Incident History — SK Telecom Americas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SK Telecom Americas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BT Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BT Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sk-telecom-americas.jpeg
SK Telecom Americas
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bt.jpeg
BT Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exposed Default Password
Motivation: Unintentional Exposure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

BT Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SK Telecom Americas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BT Group company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to SK Telecom Americas company.

In the current year, SK Telecom Americas company has reported more cyber incidents than BT Group company.

BT Group company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while SK Telecom Americas company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SK Telecom Americas company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other BT Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither BT Group company nor SK Telecom Americas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SK Telecom Americas company nor BT Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor BT Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

BT Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SK Telecom Americas company.

BT Group company employs more people globally than SK Telecom Americas company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor BT Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor BT Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor BT Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor BT Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor BT Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SK Telecom Americas nor BT Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N