Comparison Overview
Six Flags New England

Six Flags New England
1623 Main St Agawam, Massachusetts 01001, US
Last Update: 19/04/2026
Six Flags New England, The Entertainment Capital of New England, is a 230-acre theme park that is home to 11 heart-pounding roller coasters and great family entertainment.

Sony
1-7-1 Konan,, Tokyo, 108-0075, JP
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Sony’s purpose is simple. We aim to fill the world with emotion, through the power of creativity and technology. We want to be responsible for getting hearts racing, stirring ambition, and putting a smile on the faces of our customers. That challenge, combined with our ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Six Flags New England







Sony






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Six Flags New England in 2026.
Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)
Sony has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Six Flags New England (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Six Flags New England cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sony (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Six Flags New England

Sony
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 fails to restrict the advanced_config field to administrators, allowing non-admin users with manage permissions to inject arbitrary nginx directives. Attackers can inject malicious nginx configuration such as alias directives to serve arbitrary files or control routing for their assigned hosts.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/README.md#L36
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/user.js#L52-L62
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/templates/proxy_host.conf#L28
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/5749
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-improper-authorization-via-advanced-config
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 lacks rate-limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any account. Attackers can brute-force login credentials via POST /api/tokens and subsequently guess TOTP codes via POST /api/tokens/2fa to gain full session access and administrative control.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/app.js#L15-L58
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/2fa.js#L196-L240
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/token.js#L154-L182
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-missing-brute-force-protection
httpdbg before 2.2.1 fails to validate URL schemes in recorded HTTP request URLs rendered as clickable links in the web interface. Attackers controlling traffic recorded by httpdbg can supply javascript: scheme URLs that execute malicious scripts in the application origin when clicked, allowing access to captured request and response data including headers and tokens.
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/hooks/recordhttp2.py#L88-L97
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/webapp/static/index.htm#L302
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/commit/121845b41c19ddaf30b51be0797bc2ff4847d8b3
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/issues/220
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/pull/222
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/releases/tag/v2.2.1
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/httpdbg-before-2.2.1-stored-cross-site-scripting-via-javascript-url
Dozzle versions before 11.1.2 fail to sanitize container display names when building ZIP archive entry names in the log download endpoint. Attackers who can label containers can use path traversal sequences to write files outside the extraction directory when users download and extract logs.
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/container/docker/client.go#L610-L614
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/web/download.go#L141-L146
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/commit/bc07db73dd84ce2cb939b744e983a8cfdf29c644
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/pull/5242
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/releases/tag/v11.1.2
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dozzle-before-11.1.2-path-traversal-via-log-zip-download
A vulnerability has been found in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/ZRQos/set_online_client. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.