Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Six Flags Magic MountainSix Flags Magic Mountain
VS
Six Flags Entertainment CorporationSix Flags Entertainment Corporation
Six Flags Magic Mountain

Six Flags Magic Mountain

26101 Magic Mountain Parkway, Valencia, CA 91355, US

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
764/1000Fair

Known as the “Thrill Capital of the World,” Six Flags Magic Mountain, located north of Los Angeles on Magic Mountain Parkway, is a 260-acre theme park that boasts 20 world-class roller coasters - more than any other theme park on the planet!

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

8701 Red Oak Blvd, Charlotte, 28217, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sixflags.com
781/1000Fair

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (NYSE: FUN) is North America’s largest regional amusement-resort operator with 26 amusement parks, 15 water parks and 9 resort properties across 16 states in the U.S., Canada and Mexico. Focused on its purpose of making people happy, ...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:21,530
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Six Flags Magic Mountain

Six Flags Magic Mountain

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Six Flags Magic Mountain in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Six Flags Magic Mountain (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Six Flags Magic Mountain cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Six Flags Magic Mountain

Six Flags Magic Mountain

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain company and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Six Flags Magic Mountain or Six Flags Entertainment Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Six Flags Magic Mountain or Six Flags Entertainment Corporation ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Six Flags Magic Mountain and Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA