Comparison Overview
SITAEL-Hellas S.Ltd

SITAEL-Hellas S.Ltd
4, Dion. Solomou, Veria, 59100, GR
Last Update: 07/03/2026
SITAEL HELLAS is able to cover all the processes needed for the Design and Test of Electronic Equipment and sub-systems compliant with high reliability standards. The company has been founded in 2013, carrying out activities especially in the in-space propulsion fiel...

B/E Aerospace
Corporate Headquarters, Cedar Rapids, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
B/E Aerospace is now part of Rockwell Collins. With the acquisition of B/E Aerospace in April 2017, Rockwell Collins is now a world leader in designing, developing and manufacturing cabin interior products and services that deliver innovation, reliability and efficien...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SITAEL-Hellas S.Ltd







B/E Aerospace






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SITAEL-Hellas S.Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for B/E Aerospace in 2026.
Incident History - SITAEL-Hellas S.Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SITAEL-Hellas S.Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - B/E Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)
B/E Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SITAEL-Hellas S.Ltd

B/E Aerospace
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.