Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IPS a SITA companyIPS a SITA company
VS
SONDASONDA
IPS a SITA company

IPS a SITA company

Voßkuhle 37, Dortmund, DE, 44141

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.materna-ips.com/
696/1000Weak

As the leading supplier for airports and airlines, IPS a SITA company offers its Intelligent Passenger Solutions (IPS) solutions for automated passenger handling at the airport. Our team of certified IT specialists, project, sales and marketing professionals provides cu...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:126
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
SONDA

SONDA

Teatinos 500, Santiago, CL

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sonda.com
794/1000Fair

We are at the forefront of digital transformation in the Americas, positively impacting the lives of over 500 million people. As a key player in emerging industries, we drive innovation and change through ambitious modernization projects and cutting-edge solutions. By u...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,805
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IPS a SITA company

IPS a SITA company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SONDA

SONDA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPS a SITA company in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SONDA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IPS a SITA company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPS a SITA company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SONDA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SONDA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IPS a SITA company

IPS a SITA company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAT7930723
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAT25031723
SONDA

SONDA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IPS a SITA company company and SONDA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IPS a SITA company and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IPS a SITA company and SONDA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IPS a SITA company or SONDA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IPS a SITA company or SONDA ?
Between IPS a SITA company and SONDA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IPS a SITA company and SONDA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3