Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sistemi Informativi, an IBM CompanySistemi Informativi, an IBM Company
VS
Infosys BPMInfosys BPM
Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company

Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company

Via Luigi Stipa, 150, Roma, 00148, IT

Last Update: 03/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.sistinf.it
739/1000Moderate

La Sistemi Informativi è una società leader di progettazione e realizzazione di soluzioni IT complesse ed è parte integrante del Gruppo IBM Italia. Nata nel 1979, opera in diversi settori di mercato come la Pubblica Amministrazione Centrale e Locale, il Settore Bancari...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:910
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM Limited, Plot no 26/3, 26/4, 26/6, Hosur Road, Electronics City, Bengaluru, 560100, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.infosysbpm.com
814/1000Good

Infosys BPM Ltd., the business process management subsidiary of Infosys Ltd. (NYSE: INFY), was set up in April 2002. Infosys BPM focuses on integrated end-to-end outsourcing and delivers transformational benefits to its clients through reduced costs, ongoing productivit...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:43,598
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company

Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company has 33.77% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infosys BPM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Infosys BPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys BPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company

Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SIS1777847095
Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company company and Infosys BPM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company and Infosys BPM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company and Infosys BPM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company or Infosys BPM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company or Infosys BPM ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company and Infosys BPM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sistemi Informativi, an IBM Company and Infosys BPM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA