Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung CentreSingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre
VS
AdventHealthAdventHealth
SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre

SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre

Singapore, SG

Last Update: 23/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://linktr.ee/sdlung
762/1000Fair

SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre is dedicated to delivering high quality and seamless clinical care for all thoracic conditions. We have a core team from Respiratory Medicine, Thoracic Surgery and Medical Oncology that is supported by Thoracic Support Services (Diagnosti...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AdventHealth

AdventHealth

900 Hope Way, Altamonte Springs, 32714, US

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://JoinAdventHealth.com
747/1000Moderate

AdventHealth is a connected network of care that helps people feel whole – body, mind and spirit. More than 100,000 team members across a national footprint provide whole-person care to nearly nine million people annually through more than 2,000 care sites that include ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:39,099
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre

SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AdventHealth

AdventHealth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

AdventHealth has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AdventHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AdventHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre

SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AdventHealth

AdventHealth

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
XSOHONADVMAY1780958028

FAQ

Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre company and AdventHealth company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre and AdventHealth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre and AdventHealth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre or AdventHealth ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre or AdventHealth ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre and AdventHealth, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SingHealth Duke-NUS Lung Centre and AdventHealth, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1