Comparison Overview
SimpleRetail

SimpleRetail
9th Avenue South, Federal Way, 98003, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Consumers are buying more from digital channels - curbside (buy online & drive to pick up), home delivery, and buy-online-pickup-in-store (BOPIS). The “new normal” after COVID-19 has accelerated this change. The question is – “Are you prepared to offer your consumers ...

Fred Meyer
N/A
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The Kroger Co., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a food retailer in the United States. The company operates three formats of supermarkets: combination food and drug stores (combo stores), multi department stores, and price impact warehouse stores or marketpla...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SimpleRetail







Fred Meyer






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SimpleRetail in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fred Meyer in 2026.
Incident History - SimpleRetail (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SimpleRetail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fred Meyer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fred Meyer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SimpleRetail

Fred Meyer
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.