Comparison Overview
SIMBA Telecom

SIMBA Telecom
1 Kaki Bukit View, Tech View, Singapore, 415941, SG
Last Update: 29/03/2026
SIMBA Telecom, formerly known as TPG Telecom, is 1 of 4 Mobile Network Operators in Singapore.

Tata Communications
Tata Communications Ltd, Mumbai, 400070, IN
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Tata Communications is a digital ecosystem enabler that powers today’s fast-growing digital economy. We enable the digital transformation of enterprises globally, including 300 of the Fortune 500. We carry around 30% of the world’s internet routes and connects businesse...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SIMBA Telecom







Tata Communications






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
SIMBA Telecom has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tata Communications in 2026.
Incident History - SIMBA Telecom (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SIMBA Telecom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tata Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tata Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SIMBA Telecom

Tata Communications
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.