Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Silcock Leedham Group LimitedSilcock Leedham Group Limited
VS
Burns & McDonnellBurns & McDonnell
Silcock Leedham Group Limited

Silcock Leedham Group Limited

Upperbank House, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS184BN, GB

Last Update: 01/11/2025

View Profile
750/1000Fair

Silcock Leedham are Mechanical & Electrical Building Services Consulting Engineers, with broad based expertise in all construction sectors including offices, laboratories, education, public buildings specialist services and industrial warehousing both in the UK and over...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:43
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.burnsmcd.com
783/1000Fair

At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenge...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:15,385
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Silcock Leedham Group Limited

Silcock Leedham Group Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Silcock Leedham Group Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Silcock Leedham Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Silcock Leedham Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Silcock Leedham Group Limited

Silcock Leedham Group Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Burns & McDonnell

Burns & McDonnell

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited company and Burns & McDonnell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited and Burns & McDonnell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Silcock Leedham Group Limited or Burns & McDonnell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Silcock Leedham Group Limited or Burns & McDonnell ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Silcock Leedham Group Limited and Burns & McDonnell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-55175
SUMMARY

Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-44383
SUMMARY

Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42952
SUMMARY

Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-20744
SUMMARY

The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-15089
SUMMARY

vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-10
UPDATED
Date2026-07-10
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA