Comparison Overview

Signal South, LLC

VS

Greenrail Group

Signal South, LLC

12276 San Jose Blvd., Jacksonville, Florida, 32223, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Signal South, LLC is a railroad signal design & engineering firm based out of Jacksonville, Florida. We provide railroad signal Design & Engineering, Construction, and Project Management solutions to customers throughout the United States. Our teams have extensive experience in both preliminary and full service design/build engineering of railroad signal systems, and is providing signal design, application programming and commissioning support for several major railroad customers. Our experienced construction management teams will supervise all aspects of the on-site installation, including ground-breaking to final installation and commissioning. The project management team can and will handle all aspects of the design-build process from scheduling, budgeting, and coordinating the final design of each phase. For more information on our services or to setup an appointment with a representative, feel free to call us at (904) 647-7022 on Monday - Friday between 8 am - 5 pm.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Greenrail Group

Via Giovanni Durando n.39 PoliHub, Milano, Italia, 20158, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Greenrail s.r.l. is an Italian company that designed and patented an innovative and eco-friendly railway sleeper made up of an inner core in concrete and an outer shell obtained from a mix of recycled plastic and rubber collected from ELTs (End of Life Tires). Compared to concrete sleepers, Greenrail™ reduces the cost of maintenance of lines, contributes to reduce noise and vibration levels, and increases sleeper's lifespan. Also, it is designed to incorporate within it any type of systems such as a photovoltaic panel for solar energy harvesting, data transmission systems for the control of safety and telecommunications and many other, which makes Greenrail a revolutionary product in the railway sector.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signal-south.jpeg
Signal South, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenrail-srl.jpeg
Greenrail Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Signal South, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Greenrail Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Signal South, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greenrail Group in 2025.

Incident History — Signal South, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Signal South, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Greenrail Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greenrail Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/signal-south.jpeg
Signal South, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greenrail-srl.jpeg
Greenrail Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Signal South, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Greenrail Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Greenrail Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Signal South, LLC company.

In the current year, Greenrail Group company and Signal South, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Greenrail Group company nor Signal South, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Greenrail Group company nor Signal South, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Greenrail Group company nor Signal South, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Signal South, LLC company nor Greenrail Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Signal South, LLC nor Greenrail Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Signal South, LLC company nor Greenrail Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Signal South, LLC company employs more people globally than Greenrail Group company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Signal South, LLC nor Greenrail Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Signal South, LLC nor Greenrail Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Signal South, LLC nor Greenrail Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Signal South, LLC nor Greenrail Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Signal South, LLC nor Greenrail Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Signal South, LLC nor Greenrail Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H