Comparison Overview

Sigma

VS

Krispy Kreme

Sigma

MX, 66254
Last Update: 2025-12-09

We are a global food company dedicated to bringing local favorite foods to communities everywhere. Within 17 countries, we offer quality branded food at a range of price points and across diverse categories. We're a company dedicated to the production, distribution and sales of refrigerated and frozen products such as cold meats, dry meats, cheese, yogurt, prepared meals and beverages. We have a strong diversified portfolio of well-positioned brands that market in the countries where we participate. We operate in 64 production plants, serving more than 670,000 customers in North, Central, South America, the Caribbean and Europe. We strive for excellence in everything we do. We're passionate about innovation and our consumers; we're committed in bringing them the best quality and taste in every product. The passion and effort we invest in our work is the reason we're on the road to success.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 12,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Krispy Kreme

2116 Hawkins St, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28203
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Krispy Kreme is one of the most beloved and well-known sweet treat brands in the world. Our iconic Original Glazed® doughnut is universally recognized for its hot-off-the-line, melt-in-your-mouth experience. Krispy Kreme operates in more than 40 countries through its unique network of fresh doughnut shops, partnerships with leading retailers, and a rapidly growing digital business. Our purpose of touching and enhancing lives through the joy that is Krispy Kreme guides how we operate every day and is reflected in the love we have for our people, our communities, and the planet.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 10,045
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigma-alimentos.jpeg
Sigma
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krispy-kreme.jpeg
Krispy Kreme
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Sigma
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Krispy Kreme
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sigma in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Krispy Kreme in 2025.

Incident History — Sigma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sigma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Krispy Kreme (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Krispy Kreme cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigma-alimentos.jpeg
Sigma
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krispy-kreme.jpeg
Krispy Kreme
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Sigma company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Krispy Kreme company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Krispy Kreme company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Sigma company has not reported any.

In the current year, Krispy Kreme company and Sigma company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Krispy Kreme company nor Sigma company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Krispy Kreme company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Sigma company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Krispy Kreme company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sigma company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Sigma company nor Krispy Kreme company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Sigma nor Krispy Kreme holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Sigma company nor Krispy Kreme company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sigma company employs more people globally than Krispy Kreme company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Sigma nor Krispy Kreme holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Sigma nor Krispy Kreme holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Sigma nor Krispy Kreme holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Sigma nor Krispy Kreme holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Sigma nor Krispy Kreme holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Sigma nor Krispy Kreme holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N