Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

SIGA - Multi Level OT ResilienceSIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience
VS
Red HatRed Hat
SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience

SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience

1013 Centre Rd, Wilmington, 403-B, US

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sigasec.com
744/1000Moderate

SIGA provides a Process-Oriented OT Cybersecurity with real-time decision- making capabilities for managing critical Incident Response (IR) phases of an OT cyberattack – including Detection, Containment and Cyber-attack Forensics. Unlike other solutions, SIGA detects al...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Red Hat

Red Hat

100 E. Davie St., Raleigh, NC, US, 27601

Last Update: 19/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.redhat.com
688/1000Weak

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, hybrid cloud, edge, and Kubernetes technologies. We hire creative, passionate people who are ready to contribute their idea...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:19,335
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience

SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Red Hat

Red Hat

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Hat in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Red Hat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Hat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience

SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UNISIGEMVTEA1782484008
Red Hat

Red Hat

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RED4732847100725
🔒 Incident : Breach
RED4292342100825
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
RED1694016100125

FAQ

Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience company and Red Hat company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience and Red Hat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience and Red Hat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience or Red Hat ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience or Red Hat ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience and Red Hat, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between SIGA - Multi Level OT Resilience and Red Hat, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8