Comparison Overview
SIGAL Insurance Group

SIGAL Insurance Group
Blv. "Zogu I", nr. 1,, SIGAL BUSINESS CENTER, Tirana, Tirana, AL, 1001
Last Update: 28/03/2026
SHTRIRJE RAJONALE SIGAL Insurance Group është një prej grupeve më të mëdhenj të sigurimeve në rajon. E themeluar në 22 shkurt 1999, SIGAL operon suksesshëm në Shqipëri, Kosovë dhe Maqedoni e Veriut përmes 8 kompanive nga të cilat: 6 kompani sigurimi jetë dhe jo-jetë; 1 ...

Allstate
3100 Sanders Rd, Northbrook, 60062, US
Last Update: 11/08/2026
At Allstate, we're advocates for peace of mind and a good life. And that comes through in everything we do. From building innovative teams that truly understand our customers' needs, to challenging each other to develop our careers in a meaningful way, and finally to ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

SIGAL Insurance Group







Allstate






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SIGAL Insurance Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Allstate has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - SIGAL Insurance Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SIGAL Insurance Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Allstate (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Allstate cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

SIGAL Insurance Group

Allstate
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.