Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Siemens

Siemens Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

siemens.com

Siemens AG (Berlin and Munich) is a leading technology company focused on industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare. The company’s purpose is to create technology to transform the everyday, for everyone. By combining the real and the digital worlds, Siemens empowers customers to accelerate their digital and sustainability transformations, making factories more efficient, cities more livable, and transportation more sustainable. A leader in industrial AI, Siemens leverages its deep domain know-how to apply AI – including generative AI – to real-world applications, making AI accessible and impactful for customers across diverse industries. Siemens also owns a majority stake in the publicly listed company Siemens Healthineers, a


Siemens A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Siemens
Company Information
Website:http://www.siemens.com
Employees number:277,193
Number of followers:9,175,728
NAICS:33325
Industry Type:Automation Machinery Manufacturing
Homepage:siemens.com
Siemens Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
SiemensAutomation Machinery Manufacturing
Updated:
02/08/2026
785/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Siemens Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
SiemensAutomation Machinery Manufacturing
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Siemens
SiemensFair
Current Score
785Baa (FAIR)
01000
3 incidents
-31 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
AUGUST 2026
785Before Incident
JULY 2026
794Before Incident
Cyber Attack
28 Jul 2026Siemens
City of Maple Plain, Rockwell Automation, Municipal Water Authority of Aliquippa, Schneider Electric and Siemens: Hackers are going after our water now — over 30 Minnesota utilities hit in coordinated cyberattack by apparent Iranian attackers

Iranian-Linked Cyberattack Disrupts 30+ Minnesota Water Systems

785After Incident
CRITICAL-9
SCHMAPSOUSIEROC1785680820
Iranian-Linked Cyberattack Disrupts 30+ Minnesota Water Systems A coordinated cyberattack targeted operational technology (OT) across more than 30 community water systems in Minnesota, disrupting pumps, wells, water towers, and wastewater lift stations. The incident, disclosed by Minnesota IT Services on July 28, 2026, forced several towns into manual operations but did not prompt any advisories for residents to alter water usage. A leaked WaterISAC memo, marked TLP: AMBER, attributed the intrusions to Iranian-affiliated hackers, though no U.S. agency has formally confirmed the attribution. The memo, corroborated by The New York Times and The Washington Post, cited intelligence from federal officials and state fusion centers. The attack exploited internet-facing programmable logic controllers (PLCs) from manufacturers like Rockwell Automation, Schneider Electric, and Siemens echoing a CISA advisory (AA26-097A) issued four days prior. The warning, which went largely unheeded, highlighted ongoing threats to U.S. water, energy, and government sectors, including confirmed disruptions and financial losses. Key impacts included: - Braham (pop. 1,700): Attackers disabled controls at the water treatment plant and well, forcing manual restoration within hours. - Plymouth (pop. 80,000): Compromised cellular-linked equipment at water towers and lift stations was isolated to prevent further damage. - Maple Plain and South St. Paul: Reported partial automation failures, though contingency plans maintained operations. CISA later warned that attackers were changing PLC passwords to lock out operators, reiterating long-standing guidance to remove PLCs from public internet access and secure remote connections via VPNs. The incident follows a November 2023 attack on Pennsylvania’s Municipal Water Authority of Aliquippa, where Iranian-linked actors defaced a Unitronics controller with an anti-Israel message exploiting default passwords. Despite repeated warnings, many small water systems lack dedicated cybersecurity resources. The timing coincides with escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran, including recent U.S. strikes near the Strait of Hormuz that disrupted water supplies for over 20,000 people. While the Minnesota disruptions were brief, the attack underscores persistent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyberattack on Operational Technology (OT)
MOTIVATION
Disruption of critical infrastructure, geopolitical tensions
IMPACT
PumpsWellsWater towersWastewater lift stationsOperational Impact: Forced manual operations in multiple towns
JUNE 2026
791Before Incident
MAY 2026
789Before Incident
APRIL 2026
789Before Incident
MARCH 2026
786Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
786Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
785Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
784Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
783Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
834Before Incident
Ransomware
04 Oct 2025Siemens
Dimensional Control Systems (DCS)

Ransomware Attack on Dimensional Control Systems (DCS) by J Group

781After Incident
CRITICAL-53
DIM4992449100425
A ransomware group, J Group, claimed a major breach of Dimensional Control Systems (DCS), a Michigan-based provider of dimensional engineering software critical to manufacturing giants like Boeing, Samsung, Volkswagen, and Airbus. The attackers allegedly exfiltrated 11GB of sensitive data, including financial records, employee information, and proprietary operational documents, posting samples on the dark web as leverage for ransom demands. The breach poses severe risks to supply chain security, potentially exposing intellectual property (e.g., aerospace designs, manufacturing tolerances) and disrupting operations for high-profile clients. Boeing’s involvement raises national security concerns due to its defense contracts, while Samsung’s prior breaches compound vulnerabilities. Though DCS has not publicly confirmed the attack, cybersecurity experts warn of cascading risks—including regulatory fines (e.g., GDPR for Volkswagen), legal actions, and reputational damage—if client data was compromised. The incident underscores the growing threat of third-party vendor attacks, where a single breach can jeopardize an entire industrial ecosystem.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
ransomwaredata breachsupply chain attack
MOTIVATION
financial gain (ransom)data theft for leverage
IMPACT
financial recordsemployee informationinternal documentsproprietary designs (potential)operational data (potential)potential disruption to precision manufacturing processes for clients (Boeing, Samsung, Volkswagen, Airbus)supply chain security riskspotential damage due to association with high-profile clients (e.g., Boeing, Airbus)loss of trust in supply chain securitypotential fines under GDPR (for Volkswagen)regulatory scrutiny (e.g., FAA for Boeing)legal actions from affected clientsemployee information exposed
DATA BREACH
financial recordsemployee informationinternal documentspotential proprietary designsSensitivity Of Data: high (includes supply chain and manufacturing data for defense/aerospace clients)Data Exfiltration: claimed (11GB of data)financial recordsemployee datascreenshotsinternal documentsemployee information
SEPTEMBER 2025
834Before Incident
JUNE 2024
825Before Incident
Vulnerability
16 Jun 2024Siemens
Siemens

Critical Vulnerability in Siemens SINAMICS S200 Drive Systems

832After Incident
CRITICAL-7
SIE903031625
Siemens has disclosed a critical vulnerability in SINAMICS S200 drive systems that could lead to a complete system compromise. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-56336, exposes affected devices to unauthorized manipulation of industrial processes, equipment damage, disruptions, and data theft due to an unlocked bootloader, which allows attackers to install malicious code without authentication. The risk is exacerbated by the device's wide use in critical industrial, manufacturing, energy, and infrastructure sectors. Although Siemens has not released a fix, it urges customers to implement network segregation and monitor systems while it works on a remedy.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability
IMPACT
Systems Affected: SINAMICS S200 drive systemsEquipment damageDisruptionsData theft

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Siemens ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Siemens's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Siemens ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Siemens's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
Siemens Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo