Comparison Overview
Siemens Digital Logistics

Siemens Digital Logistics
Stumpfstraße 1, Karlsruhe, 76131, DE
Last Update: 19/03/2026
Siemens Digital Logistics specializes in the digital transformation of logistical processes. We are a leading IT provider in global supply chain management with a portfolio of end-to-end software and consulting solutions. Strategic consulting and analysis, cloud-based s...

GlobalLogic
2535 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, 95054, US
Last Update: 03/04/2026
GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group company, is a trusted partner in design, data, and digital engineering for the world’s largest and most innovative companies. Since our inception in 2000, we have been at the forefront of the digital revolution, helping to create some of the...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Siemens Digital Logistics







GlobalLogic






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Siemens Digital Logistics in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GlobalLogic in 2026.
Incident History - Siemens Digital Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Siemens Digital Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GlobalLogic (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GlobalLogic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Siemens Digital Logistics

GlobalLogic
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.
In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.
UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.
FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.