Comparison Overview

SI Group

VS

AkzoNobel

SI Group

1790 Hughes Landing Blvd, Suite 600, The Woodlands, Texas, US, 77380
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.siigroup.com

At SI Group, we create smart chemistry that solves global challenges and makes great things possible. SI Group is a performance additives and intermediates business. We offer a broad array of products that feed into diverse applications including pharmaceuticals; plastics; oil and gas; and tires, among many others. We create solutions that provide formulators and manufacturers with the ability to increase efficacy, efficiency, productivity, and purity in countless industrial and consumer goods. Our company unites us. So do our values and the approach that we bring into the workplace each day. There’s more to a job than just the work—and we believe it’s those “other things” that set us apart - learn more about us at www.siigroup.com.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 1,985
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

AkzoNobel

Christian Neefestraat 2, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, NL, 1077 WW
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 0 and 549
http://www.akzonobel.com

Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We’re active in more than 150 countries and use our expertise to sustain and enhance everyday life. Because we believe every surface is an opportunity. It’s what you’d expect from a pioneering and long-established paints company that’s dedicated to providing sustainable solutions and preserving the best of what we have today – while creating an even better tomorrow. Let’s paint the future together.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition: Chemical Manufacturing
Employees: 31,151
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/si-group.jpeg
SI Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akzonobel.jpeg
AkzoNobel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SI Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AkzoNobel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SI Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

AkzoNobel has 25.09% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — SI Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SI Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AkzoNobel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AkzoNobel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/si-group.jpeg
SI Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/akzonobel.jpeg
AkzoNobel
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain, Operational disruption, Data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of unpatched vulnerability (React2Shell)
Motivation: Data exfiltration and ransom demand
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain (ransom demand), data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

SI Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AkzoNobel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AkzoNobel company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to SI Group company.

In the current year, AkzoNobel company has reported more cyber incidents than SI Group company.

Both AkzoNobel company and SI Group company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Neither AkzoNobel company nor SI Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AkzoNobel company nor SI Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SI Group company nor AkzoNobel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SI Group nor AkzoNobel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SI Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AkzoNobel company.

AkzoNobel company employs more people globally than SI Group company, reflecting its scale as a Chemical Manufacturing.

Neither SI Group nor AkzoNobel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SI Group nor AkzoNobel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SI Group nor AkzoNobel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SI Group nor AkzoNobel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SI Group nor AkzoNobel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SI Group nor AkzoNobel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References