Comparison Overview

ShopStyle

VS

MAS Holdings

ShopStyle

160 Spear St, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94105
Last Update: 2025-12-27
Between 700 and 749

ShopStyle is on a mission is to build a community where everyone is empowered to embrace their individual style. Now we’re taking strides to welcome more people to our community than ever before. We’re on a fast-growth path to launch onto new platforms, introduce new features for inspiration and curation, and help creators engage and monetize their audiences. ShopStyle’s people come from a wide range of background and work styles, but we are unified by our passion for creating a great shopping experience for everyone. Read on for open roles in all career levels and disciplines in great locations like San Francisco, New York, Beloit (WI), Toronto and London (as well as many that can be virtual). Find out more: https://about.shopstyle.com/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

MAS Holdings

Level 10, Aitken Spence Tower 2 Vauxhall Street Colombo, Colombo, LK
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799

MAS is an innovation driven company founded on a perfect blend of daring and visionary thinking. Focusing on fashion and lifestyle, we are one of Asia’s largest manufacturers of intimate apparel, sportswear, performance wear and swimwear and provide IT solutions to the apparel and footwear industry worldwide. MAS nurtures and drives a culture of excellence where over 114,000 global associates activate their full potential. Our identity, which goes beyond great products, is deeply embedded in community well-being and nurturing world-class teams.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shopstyle.jpeg
ShopStyle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mas-holdings.jpeg
MAS Holdings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ShopStyle
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MAS Holdings
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ShopStyle in 2025.

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAS Holdings in 2025.

Incident History — ShopStyle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShopStyle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MAS Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAS Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/shopstyle.jpeg
ShopStyle
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Wrongdoing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mas-holdings.jpeg
MAS Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MAS Holdings company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ShopStyle company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ShopStyle company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MAS Holdings company has not reported any.

In the current year, MAS Holdings company and ShopStyle company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MAS Holdings company nor ShopStyle company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ShopStyle company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other MAS Holdings company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MAS Holdings company nor ShopStyle company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ShopStyle company nor MAS Holdings company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ShopStyle nor MAS Holdings holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MAS Holdings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ShopStyle company.

MAS Holdings company employs more people globally than ShopStyle company, reflecting its scale as a Apparel & Fashion.

Neither ShopStyle nor MAS Holdings holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ShopStyle nor MAS Holdings holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ShopStyle nor MAS Holdings holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ShopStyle nor MAS Holdings holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ShopStyle nor MAS Holdings holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ShopStyle nor MAS Holdings holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 2.0.0, in self-hosted n8n instances where the Code node runs in legacy (non-task-runner) JavaScript execution mode, authenticated users with workflow editing access can invoke internal helper functions from within the Code node. This allows a workflow editor to perform actions on the n8n host with the same privileges as the n8n process, including: reading files from the host filesystem (subject to any file-access restrictions configured on the instance and OS/container permissions), and writing files to the host filesystem (subject to the same restrictions). This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve limiting file operations by setting N8N_RESTRICT_FILE_ACCESS_TO to a dedicated directory (e.g., ~/.n8n-files) and ensure it contains no sensitive data, keeping N8N_BLOCK_FILE_ACCESS_TO_N8N_FILES=true (default) to block access to .n8n and user-defined config files, and disabling high-risk nodes (including the Code node) using NODES_EXCLUDE if workflow editors are not fully trusted.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. From version 1.0.0 to before 2.0.0, a sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in the Python Code Node that uses Pyodide. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows can exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands on the host system running n8n, using the same privileges as the n8n process. This issue has been patched in version 2.0.0. Workarounds for this issue involve disabling the Code Node by setting the environment variable NODES_EXCLUDE: "[\"n8n-nodes-base.code\"]", disabling Python support in the Code node by setting the environment variable N8N_PYTHON_ENABLED=false, which was introduced in n8n version 1.104.0, and configuring n8n to use the task runner based Python sandbox via the N8N_RUNNERS_ENABLED and N8N_NATIVE_PYTHON_RUNNER environment variables.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving LLMs. Prior to version 0.11.1, an insecure deserialization vulnerability exists in lmdeploy where torch.load() is called without the weights_only=True parameter when loading model checkpoint files. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the victim's machine when they load a malicious .bin or .pt model file. This issue has been patched in version 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to version 1.114.0, a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability may occur in n8n when using the “Respond to Webhook” node. When this node responds with HTML content containing executable scripts, the payload may execute directly in the top-level window, rather than within the expected sandbox introduced in version 1.103.0. This behavior can enable a malicious actor with workflow creation permissions to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of the n8n editor interface. This issue has been patched in version 1.114.0. Workarounds for this issue involve restricting workflow creation and modification privileges to trusted users only, avoiding use of untrusted HTML responses in the “Respond to Webhook” node, and using an external reverse proxy or HTML sanitizer to filter responses that include executable scripts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Yealink T21P_E2 Phone 52.84.0.15 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal. A remote normal privileged attacker can read arbitrary files via a crafted request result read function of the diagnostic component.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N