Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ShopStyleShopStyle
VS
BESTSELLERBESTSELLER
ShopStyle

ShopStyle

160 Spear St, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94105

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.shopstyle.com
743/1000Moderate

ShopStyle is on a mission is to build a community where everyone is empowered to embrace their individual style. Now we’re taking strides to welcome more people to our community than ever before. We’re on a fast-growth path to launch onto new platforms, introduce new fe...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:141
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
BESTSELLER

BESTSELLER

Fredskovvej, Brande, undefined, DK-7330, DK

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://bestseller.com/
786/1000Fair

At BESTSELLER, we are more than 22,000 people in 38 different countries working for over 20 fashion brands such as ONLY, JACK & JONES, VERO MODA, NAME IT, SELECTED, VILA, PIECES, OBJECT, MAMALICIOUS, NOISY MAY and Y.A.S. We are a family-owned company with a strong found...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:14,881
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ShopStyle

ShopStyle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BESTSELLER

BESTSELLER

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ShopStyle in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BESTSELLER in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ShopStyle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShopStyle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BESTSELLER (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BESTSELLER cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ShopStyle

ShopStyle

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SHO245072625
BESTSELLER

BESTSELLER

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ShopStyle company and BESTSELLER company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ShopStyle and BESTSELLER, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ShopStyle and BESTSELLER, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ShopStyle or BESTSELLER ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ShopStyle or BESTSELLER ?
Between ShopStyle and BESTSELLER, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ShopStyle and BESTSELLER, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8