Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ShopEase List & Bill AssistantShopEase List & Bill Assistant
VS
B&QB&Q
ShopEase List & Bill Assistant

ShopEase List & Bill Assistant

Melbourne, 3000, AU

Last Update: 22/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.shopeaseapp.com
729/1000Moderate

ShopEase App simplifies organizing shopping lists with real-time sharing, inventory tracking, and receipt attachments.

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
B&Q

B&Q

undefined, Southampton, undefined, undefined, GB

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

We are the UK’s leading home improvement and garden living retailer with over 300 stores throughout the UK and Ireland, offering great prices, with over 100,000 products available to order at diy.com for home delivery or click and collect. We launched the UK’s first ho...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:12,936
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ShopEase List & Bill Assistant

ShopEase List & Bill Assistant

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
B&Q

B&Q

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

ShopEase List & Bill Assistant has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B&Q in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ShopEase List & Bill Assistant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ShopEase List & Bill Assistant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - B&Q (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B&Q cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ShopEase List & Bill Assistant

ShopEase List & Bill Assistant

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SHOQUI1784730539
B&Q

B&Q

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant company and B&Q company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant and B&Q, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant and B&Q, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ShopEase List & Bill Assistant or B&Q ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ShopEase List & Bill Assistant or B&Q ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant and B&Q, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ShopEase List & Bill Assistant and B&Q, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1