Comparison Overview
Shohoz

Shohoz
Banani, Dhaka, 1213, BD
Last Update: 17/02/2026
We started our journey back in 2014 with one goal in mind- to make lives easier! As a technology-first company, we develop tech-driven solutions for the everyday challenges of Bangladeshi people. Shohoz, a pioneer in Bangladesh’s travel industry is now the largest onlin...

Akamai Technologies
8 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, US, 02142
Last Update: 28/04/2026
At Akamai, we make life better for billions of people, billions of times a day. Every day, billions of people around the world connect with their favorite brands to shop online, play the latest video games, log into mobile banking apps, learn remotely, share videos wi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Shohoz







Akamai Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Shohoz in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
Akamai Technologies has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Shohoz (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Shohoz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Akamai Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Akamai Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Shohoz

Akamai Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.
The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.
Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.
The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.